Oxbow Sued for Records of Koch's Payments to Mintz Levin
Minority investors in Oxbow Carbon, fresh off a major Delaware Court of Chancery victory, are now investigating up to $50 million in payments Oxbow made to founder and CEO William Koch's attorneys at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo.
September 06, 2018 at 04:02 PM
3 minute read
Minority investors in Oxbow Carbon, fresh off a major Delaware Court of Chancery victory, are now investigating up to $50 million in payments Oxbow made to founder and CEO William Koch's attorneys at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo.
Robert J. Hurst and Barry Volpert, principles in Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, said in a books-and-records complaint Wednesday that they were targeting ”corporate waste and inappropriate spending” on Mintz Levin, which had served Koch's interests despite signing on to represent Oxbow in a two-year suit over Crestview's right to force Oxbow's sale.
Last month, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster appointed a receiver to oversee an auction of the company, and he ordered Koch, the brother of billionaires and conservative political activists Charles and David Koch, to pay tens of millions of dollars in damages to Crestview and its affiliate Load Line for derailing a deal to sell the Oxbow in 2016.
In his ruling, Laster found that Koch had initially hired Mintz Levin to serve as his personal counsel, but later modified the firm's engagement letter so that Mintz Levin represented Oxbow.
“I personally believe Koch wanted Oxbow's counsel to be loyal to him, liked the idea that Mintz Levin would be in a position to run Oxbow's internal investigations into Koch's perceived adversaries, and understood that the minority members would effectively pay one-third of Mintz Levin's fees,” Laster wrote in an Aug. 1 decision.
Hurst and Volpert, who have served as Oxbow directors since Crestview first invested in the company back in 2007, said in their complaint that Koch had a history of using Oxbow as “his own personal ATM” and had even used company resources to fund at least some of the costs of a “lavish, celebratory post-trial vacation” for Mintz Levin attorneys at the Chatham Bars Inn on Cape Cod.
The purpose of their books-and-records suit, they said, was to identify any other alleged sources of corporate waste and to determine whether the Oxbow board had taken any steps to remedy potential breaches of fiduciary duty.
Hurst and Volpert said Koch's personal attorneys had admitted that Oxbow paid Mintz Levin more than $31 million over three years, while the firm was advancing Koch's personal interests. However, they alleged that Oxbow and lawyers for Koch refused to turn over any documentation supporting that figure. The actual cost, Crestview estimated, could be as much as $50 million, based on amounts reflected in Oxbow's financial statements for “certain items.”
“Plaintiffs are unable to determine the amount or justification for the company's spending on Mintz Levin or spending otherwise related to the exit sale litigation,” attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan wrote in the 21-page complaint.
“But whether the total amount of spending is $31 million or $50 million or more, the fact is that Mr. Koch chose to have Oxbow bear the costs of this spending rather than pay them himself. As a result, Crestview and Load Line 'indirectly bore one-third of the estimated' costs that Mr. Koch forced Oxbow to incur to litigate against Crestview and Load Line.”
Hurst and Volpert are represented by Michael B. Carlinsky, Chad Johnson, Jennifer Barrett and Silpa Maruri of Quinn Emanuel in New York.
An online docket-tracking service did not list counsel for Oxbow.
The case, captioned Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition v. Oxbow Carbon, has been assigned to Laster.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250