Trial Opens in Murder Case Stemming From Deadly Prison Uprising in Del.
Delaware prosecutors Monday mapped out their case against the first four inmates charged with the murder of Lt. Steven Floyd during a prison riot at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center last year, telling jurors that the attack unfolded in carefully planned phases.
October 22, 2018 at 06:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Delaware prosecutors Monday mapped out their case against the first four inmates charged with the murder of Lt. Steven Floyd during a prison riot at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center last year, telling jurors that the attack unfolded in carefully planned phases.
In opening arguments, state Deputy Attorney General Nicole Warner described the “coordinated violence” of the 18-hour ordeal, and identified defendants Roman Shankaras and Dwayne Staats as having taken credit for masterminding a plot to overtake the prison's C-Building on Feb. 1, 2017.
“The attack was vicious,” Warner said. “It was tragically effective, and it was planned.”
According to prosecutors, a group of about 15 masked inmates overpowered Floyd, a veteran corrections officer, around 10:15 a.m., as he called them in from the unit's recreation yard. The prisoners then attacked Floyd with mop wringers and makeshift knives and threw him into a mop closet. He was found the next morning in an office, handcuffed and face-down in about two inches of water, Warner said.
Two other corrections officers were taken hostage and suffered serious injuries, but were later released during negotiations with the Delaware State Police. A fourth victim, prison counselor Patricia May, was freed around 5 a.m. Feb. 2, when authorities stormed the building and finally ended the riot. She was not physically harmed, Warner said.
Shankaras, Staats, Deric Forney and Jarreau Ayers have each been charged with murder, assault, conspiracy and riot, along with 12 of the other 126 inmates who occupied the medium-maximum security facility at the time of the takeover. Two other defendants face similar charges, but have not been charged with the most serious count of murder.
Warner said that all of the defendants had participated in a plot to gain seize control of C-Building, and that Shankaras and Staats both claimed responsibility for the “vision” behind the attack in the days that followed. Forney, they said, had personally assaulted the officers. Meanwhile, Ayers hinted in a call just one day before the uprising that “something big's about to go down,” and had “ordered” remaining inmates in from the yard after the assault began.
Shankaras and Forney are both represented by attorneys assigned by the Office of Defense Services. Staats and Ayers have elected to represent themselves at trial.
Jason Antoine, who is representing Shankaras, said his client believed that he was preparing to participate in a peaceful demonstration to protest prison conditions when things turned violent. He said that frustration had been “brewing for a long time,” but Shankaras has no personal vendetta against Floyd.
Shankaras, he said, was in the yard when another inmate told him that plans for a peaceful protest transformed into an armed takeover.
“It was supposed to be a stand-out in the yard to protest prison conditions,” Antoine said.
“All my client wanted was to be treated with dignity.”
The defendants on Monday challenged the credibility of the state's witnesses and said they would highlight the “inconsistencies” in the accounts that fellow inmates provided to investigators. In opening arguments, they focused especially on the role of Royal Downs, a prisoner in C-Building who they painted as the true ringleader of the uprising.
“The only thing consistent about this case is going to be the inconsistencies and contradictions,” Ayers said when addressing the jury.
Downs has taken a plea deal and is cooperating with the prosecution. He has not been charged with murder.
Superior Court Judge William C. Carpenter Jr., who is presiding over the case, said the proceedings are expected to last up to four weeks. The trial is the first of five that are planned to take place over the next four months for all 18 inmates that have been charged.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250