Bouchard Orders Holding Co. to Turn Over Tax Refunds From $93.5M Deal to Buy Egg Producer
The Delaware Court of Chancery on Monday ordered Post Holdings Inc. and its Delaware subsidiary to turn over nearly $1 million in funds stemming from the food suppliers' $93.5 million deal to buy National Pasteurized Eggs Inc. in 2016.
October 29, 2018 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
The Delaware Court of Chancery on Monday ordered Post Holdings Inc. and its Delaware subsidiary to turn over nearly $1 million in funds stemming from the food suppliers' $93.5 million deal to buy National Pasteurized Eggs Inc. in 2016.
The ruling, from Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard, came in Post's October 2017 lawsuit, seeking to recover a $7.5 million contractual indemnification payment from escrow based on alleged misrepresentations NPE had made to Post during deal talks.
A representative of the Illinois-based egg producer responded last November with its own claims that Post and its subsidiary, Michael Foods of Delaware Inc., had breached a stock purchase agreement by refusing to promptly remit approximately $974,000 in tax refunds and insurance proceeds from the period before the deal closed. In June, NPE moved for judgment on the pleadings as to its counterclaims, arguing that Post and Michael Foods were trying to retain the benefits of the contract, while at the same time failing to meet their obligations under it.
On Monday, Bouchard agreed, in a 20-page memorandum opinion addressing only the NPE rep's counterclaims. In his ruling, Bouchard said that Delaware law forbids Post and Michael Foods from using a supposed breach to escape their duties under a contract that they had elected to enforce.
“Because buyers' conduct clearly indicates a desire to continue to accept the benefits of the agreement after sellers' alleged material breach, buyers must continue to be bound by and to perform under the contract as well, irrespective of whether sellers materially breached the agreement,” Bouchard said.
Attorneys for Post did not respond to calls Monday afternoon seeking comment on the decision. Kevin R. Shannon, a Potter Anderson & Corroon partner who represented NPE's representative, declined to comment, citing the firm's policy of not commenting on pending litigation.
The ruling did not touch Post's claims for fraud and breach of warranty, which are still pending before the court.
In their complaint, Post and Michael Foods, which is incorporated in Delaware but headquartered in Minnesota, said that NPE made false representations about its workforce, the condition of its production equipment and the capacity of its pasteurizers during the due-diligence period leading up to the sale. It wasn't until after the deal closed, the companies said, that they learned that NPE was violating immigration laws and could not sustain its stated production rates.
Those claims are currently the subject of discovery, and no trial date has yet been set, according to court documents.
Bouchard's opinion entered final judgment on the counterclaims from NPE's representative, clearing the way for it to collect the tax refunds and insurance proceeds that it was owed. It was not clear on Monday whether Post and Michael Foods would appeal the ruling.
The sellers are represented by Shannon, Christopher N. Kelly and Jay G. Stirling of Potter Anderson and William C. O'Neil, Jeffrey J. Huelskamp and Michael A. Meneghini of Winston & Strawn's Chicago office.
Post and Michael Foods are represented by Rodger D. Smith II, Ryan D. Stottmann and Alexandra M. Cumings of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell in Wilmington and Richard B. Walsh, Jr. and Evan Z. Reid of Lewis Rice in St. Louis.
The case is captioned Post Holdings v. NPE Seller Rep.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250