Family of Murdered Woman Fights Cabela's Bid to Toss Suit Over Alleged 'Straw' Gun Buy
Attorneys for the shooting victim's family argued that the statute extended protections only to private, unlicensed gun sellers, to whom the 2013 rule change specifically applied. Those protections would not apply to a major retailer like Cabela's.
November 12, 2018 at 05:10 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The family of a Wilmington woman killed in a 2016 drive-by shooting said last week that outdoor sporting goods retailer Cabela's could not escape civil liability for allegedly selling the murder weapon in a “straw purchase.”
The family of 19-year-old Keshall “KeKe” Anderson said in a court filing Nov. 9 that Cabela's attempt to dismiss the wrongful death suit had mischaracterized a 2013 state law that expanded the requirement that all gun sellers in Delaware perform background checks before completing a purchase.
Cabella's had argued in October that the law offered gun dealers a “complete defense” for damages when the sellers conduct a background check and receive permission to proceed with the sale.
Attorneys for Anderson's family argued that the statute—Section 1448 of Delaware's criminal code—extended protections only to private, unlicensed gun sellers, to whom the 2013 rule change specifically applied. Those protections would not apply to a major retailer like Cabela's.
“Cabela's argues that the same Delaware legislature that enacted one of the most progressive, pro-gun-violence-protection laws in the country … also chose to immunize licensed gun dealers who subvert the Brady law and supply criminals with guns through illegal, unlawful and negligent sales,” Hudson & Castle Law partner Ben Castle wrote in a brief, referencing the 1993 Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, which mandated federal background checks on firearm purchasers.
“But Delaware does not broadly immunize gun dealers, certainly not when they violate gun laws,” Castle said.
The filing comes in response to Cabela's Oct. 1 motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which accuses Cabela's of knowingly selling a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson pistol to Brilena Hardwick in a straw purchase. According to court documents, Hardwick immediately gave the weapon to her boyfriend, John Kuligowski, to sell on the black market. Kuligowski, a convicted felon, was legally barred from purchasing firearms, court documents said.
According to the complaint, Abdullah Brown and Deonta Carney, both 16, used the same weapon in a drive-by shooting around the corner from Anderson's home in September 2016. Anderson, the mother of a 6-month-old boy, was struck multiple times in the crossfire and later died of her injuries.
The News Journal reported earlier this year that a murder trial for Brown and Carney ended in a mistrial, after a juror failed to report for the second day of deliberations. Kuligowski was sentenced to 27 months for possessing a firearm while prohibited, the paper reported.
Anderson's family said Cabela's “knew or should have known that a straw purchase was underway,” but ignored “red flags” that obligated the company to obtain more information to ensure that Hardwick was the actual buyer.
Francis G.X. Pileggi, who is representing Cabela's, argued that state law protected the Bass Pro Shops subsidiary from damages allegedly caused by transfers after a background check was conducted.
“The transfer of the firearm to Hardwick was 'compliant' based on plaintiffs' own allegations and, under this circumstance, Delaware law does not permit plaintiffs to argue that defendants had reason to suspect Hardwick purchased the firearm for another—or that defendants should be liable based on such allegations,” Pileggi, a member and vice chair of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott commercial litigation practice, said in Cabela's six-page motion.
On Friday, Anderson's family said that lawmakers only intended to fill a loophole in the Brady Act by requiring private dealers to run background checks for potential gun buyers, and Cabela's thus could not benefit from protections that do not apply to licensed dealers.
“It makes sense, as a matter of policy and logic, that the Delaware legislature would choose to treat private sellers, and sales made by a licensed gun dealer, differently,” Castle wrote. “When a [federal firearms licensee] is directly selling to a customer, it has a greater financial stake in the transaction and more opportunity to observe and interact with the buyer than when it is facilitating a transfer between third parties who have decided on a sale, and simply need a [federal firearms licensee] to do a background check.”
The family, which includes Anderson's young son and parents, are also represented by Bruce L. Hudson of Hudson & Castle and Jonathan E. Lowy and Erin C. Davis of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in Washington, D.C.
The case, in Delaware Superior Court, is captioned Summers v. Cabela's.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250