Delaware Jury Hands Bio-Rad $24 Million Patent Infringement Verdict
A Delaware jury found that 10x Genomics infringed all seven asserted claims related to droplet microfluidic technology.
November 15, 2018 at 02:24 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. and the University of Chicago have won a $24 million patent infringement verdict against gene-sequencing startup 10x Genomics Inc.
A Delaware federal jury found that 10x willfully infringed all seven asserted patent claims, and turned back all of 10x's challenges to the patents' validity.
The patents relate to droplet microfluidic technology, in which genetic reactions are performed in a drop of water. A variety of 10x's genomics products were found to infringe.
“We are obviously pleased with the outcome of the case,” Bio-Rad CEO Norman Schwartz said in a written statement. “Bio-Rad remains committed to growing and protecting its portfolio of patents in the droplet microfluidics space and to delivering differentiated genomics technologies that enable world class research.”
The trial featured an all-star cast of patent litigators, with a team led by Weil, Gotshal & Manges Silicon Valley partner Edward Reines representing Bio-Rad. Assisting him were Weil counsel Derek Walter and Robert Vlasis and associates Amanda Branch and Christopher Lavin, plus local counsel Brian and Michael Farnan of Farnan LLP.
10x, a late-stage venture company backed by Softbank, Fidelity Investments and others, was represented by Matthew Powers of Tensegrity Law Group, along with counsel from Irell & Manella; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; and Richards, Layton & Finger.
“The jury's diligence and the power of University of Chicago's patents is vividly shown by the more than 100 favorable verdict questions and the award of all relief requested,” Reines said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
6 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250