Moore, Del. Supreme Court Justice and Seminal Voice on Corporate Law, Dies at 83
Former state Supreme Court Justice Andrew G.T. Moore II, regarded as one of the seminal voices in Delaware corporate law, died Monday at the age of 83.
December 13, 2018 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Former state Supreme Court Justice Andrew G.T. Moore II, regarded as one of the seminal voices in Delaware corporate law, died Monday at the age of 83.
Moore, whose legal career spanned more than five decades, served 12 years on the state high court, where he wrote landmark decisions in Revlon v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings and Aronson v. Lewis, among others. A native of New Orleans, Moore also launched the Tulane Corporate Law Institute conference, and in his later years helped to build out the Wilmington office of Gibbons.
The law firm announced Moore's passing in a press release Thursday.
“He immediately raised the firm's profile in a region that is vital to many of our clients' businesses, added a layer of instant credibility in that market, and worked closely with firm management to broaden and enhance our services there,” Patrick C. Dunican Jr., Gibbons' chairman and managing director, said in a statement. “And beyond Gibbons, he left an indelible legacy for the legal community throughout Delaware.”
Prior to his service on the bench, Moore practiced corporate litigation as a partner at Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz in Wilmington. He was appointed to serve as a justice by Gov. Pierre S. duPont IV in 1982 and quickly earned a reputation as the court's leading jurist on matters of corporate governance.
Moore's 1986 ruling in Revlon crafted an enduring doctrine requiring that a company's board of directors make a reasonable effort to obtain the highest value for a company when a hostile takeover or change of control is imminent. In Aronson, Moore laid out the test used by Delaware courts to determine whether a derivative plaintiff's demand would have been futile.
His other decisions include Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum, Weinberger v. UOP and Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical.
“At a critical time when Delaware law needed to innovate to address the takeover boom of the 1980s, Justice Moore crafted opinions that secured Delaware's role as the forum where all parties knew they would get a fair hearing and a sensible result at the speed demanded by the business world,” the Delaware Judiciary said in a statement. “To this day, his decisions in Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum and Aronson v. Lewis are required reading in any corporate law class in the United States.”
After retiring from the court, Moore took a job as senior managing director of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, an international investment bank, where he specialized in the areas of mergers and acquisitions and advising special committees of boards of directors. In 1988, Moore started the annual Tulane corporate law conference, which has expanded to include more than 700 participants, including prominent figures from Delaware's bench and bar.
He also taught corporate law and business ethics at Tulane University School of Law, Washington University School of Law and Widener University School of Law.
In 2011, he returned from a second retirement to expand Gibbons' practice in Wilmington, where he worked with his son-in-law, Christopher Viceconte, director of the Wilmington office's commercial and corporate litigation practice.
Arthur L. Dent, a partner with Potter Anderson & Corroon, said Moore was already seen as a corporate law giant by the time he clerked for the judge in the summer of 1985. Dent described Moore as “principled and demanding” boss, who stressed the importance of honesty and integrity.
“People who came to work with him really adored him,” Dent said. “I was a little bit awed [by him], but we hit it off and became lifelong friends. In many ways, I considered him family.”
“It's a huge loss for the legal community and the community at large,” he said.
Viceconte met Moore in 2004, after he started dating Moore's daughter Marianne. Viceconte said Moore was a generous mentor, who shaped his life both personally and professionally.
“My relationship from Day 1 was Drew,” he said. “He was just a great friend—extremely fun to be around, never said no to anything and loved his family.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readEtsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250