Two More Ex-Wilmington Trust Executives Sentenced, Capping Prosecution Over Bank's Downfall
Both men were convicted in May, along with former Wilmington Trust president Robert V.A. Harra and David Gibson, who served as the bank's chief financial officer, of multiple crimes stemming from the bank's collapse in 2011.
December 19, 2018 at 05:55 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The former chief credit officer and controller of Wilmington Trust were sentenced to prison Wednesday, capping the prosecution of four top executives for their roles in a massive reporting scandal that hid hundreds of millions of dollars in bad loans and ultimately led to the bank's downfall.
U.S. District Judge Richard G. Andrews of the District of Delaware sentenced William North, Wilmington Trust's lead credit officer, to four and a half years in prison and a $100,000 fine. Kevyn Rakowski, the bank's former controller, received a sentence of three years.
Both men were convicted in May, along with former Wilmington Trust president Robert V.A. Harra and David Gibson, who served as the bank's chief financial officer, of multiple crimes stemming from the bank's collapse in 2011.
On Monday, Andrews sentenced Harra and Gibson both to six years in prison and ordered them each to pay $300,000 in fines.
During a two month trial, federal prosecutors proved all four defendants conspired to falsely report to regulators and investors the amount of the bank's past due loans, causing the bank to underreport approximately $300 million in past due loans in the third and fourth quarters of 2009.
According to the indictment, the bank used the false securities filings to raise $287 million in a February 2010 stock sale. When the discrepancies were discovered in 2010, Wilmington Trust was sold to M&T Bank in a fire sale, which resulted in 700 employees losing their jobs.
U.S. Attorney David C. Weiss said Wednesday that the sentences sent a “clear message” that top corporate bankers cannot avoid reporting rules for disclosure regarding the soundness of financial institutions and their assets.
“The defendants' actions contributed to the downfall of an important Delaware institution, causing hundreds of employees to lose their jobs and investors to lose hundreds of millions of dollars when the bank's stock price collapsed,” Weiss said in a statement. “The sentences imposed by the court appropriately punish the defendants for their serious criminal conduct and strongly encourage other corporate executives to follow the law.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTX Estate Seeks to Recoup $1.76B From Binance, Plus Exec 'Piggy Bank' Payouts
3 minute readWells Fargo Seeks Declaratory Judgment Against 'YGC' Debt Collection Copyright Claim
4 minute readAntitrust Lawsuit Alleges Scheme to Block Digital-Wallet Competitors, Monopolize Cash Access at US Casinos
Securities Litigation Cases Continued to Decline Nationally in 2023, Report Finds
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250