Del. High Court Overturns Forced Sale of William Koch's Oxbow Carbon
The Delaware Supreme Court on Thursday reversed a Chancery Court decision forcing billionaire William I. Koch to sell his $3 billion energy company so that two private equity firms could recoup their investment in the company.
January 17, 2019 at 05:48 PM
4 minute read
The Delaware Supreme Court on Thursday reversed a Chancery Court decision forcing billionaire William I. Koch to sell his $3 billion energy company so that two private equity firms could recoup their investment in the company.
A full panel of the high court said that Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster had misconstrued Oxbow Carbon LLC's agreement when he ruled last February that Crestview Partners and Load Line Capital LLC could pursue a full-company sale, which the firms claimed they had bargained for when they invested in Florida-based Oxbow back in 2007.
Laster had applied the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing to fill gap that, he said, blocked Koch's attempt to thwart the sale. Laster later appointed a monitor to oversee the sale and ordered Koch to pay tens of millions of dollars in damages for derailing the sale in 2016.
William Koch is the brother of the billionaire conservative political activists Charles and David Koch.
However, Supreme Court Justice Karen L. Valihura said no such gap existed and vacated Laster's remedies ruling from August.
“Although Oxbow's handling of the issuances was hardly a model of good corporate governance, [Crestview and Load Line] were highly sophisticated entities with three board members who were capable of reading the LLC Agreement and bargaining for the rights they now seek through litigation,” Valihura wrote in a 47-page opinion.
William Koch said Thursday that he was “pleased that the Supreme Court unanimously agreed with Oxbow on all issues in this litigation.”
“We are evaluating our next steps,” he said in a statement. “Oxbow is a very profitable company and an industry leader. We will continue to provide our clients with the highest quality products and the best service.”
A spokeswoman for Oxbow's Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo attorneys, meanwhile, declared the ruling a “full and complete victory.” R. Robert Popeo, who represented Oxbow, directed inquiries to a company spokesman, who did not immediately return a call Thursday afternoon requesting comment.
Attorneys for Crestview and Load Line did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Laster's ruling had set the stage for Oxbow's sale within a year, and aimed to resolve more than two years of messy Chancery Court litigation, where Koch had accused Crestview and Load Line of conspiring to force him out of Oxbow in order to force a quick sale as commodities prices tanked.
The case, which went to trial in July 2017, also featured wide-ranging allegations of wrongdoing, including assertions from Koch that Crestview had planted a “mole” on the Oxbow board to spy on him and pressure him to resign.
Crestview likewise countered by accusing Koch of mismanagement and boardroom paranoia.
According to court documents, Koch even went so far as to install cameras at company facilities and had hired private investigators to help build his case against Crestview. Surveillance records and other information were turned over to the investors in discovery.
Valihura remanded the case to Laster for further proceedings, though it was not clear Thursday what would be the “next steps” in the litigation.
Oxbow is one of the world's largest producers of petroleum coke, a valuable by-product of the oil refining process, which is used in aluminum production.
Oxbow is represented by Kenneth J. Nachbar, Thomas W. Briggs Jr. and Richard Li of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell and Michael S. Gardener, Breton Leone-Quick and R. Robert Popeo of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky. Koch is represented by Stephen C. Norman, Jaclyn C. Levy and Daniyal M. Iqbal of Potter Anderson & Corroon and David Hennes and C. Thomas Brown of Ropes & Gray.
Crestview is represented by Kevin G. Abrams, Michael A. Barlow, J. Peter Shindel Jr., Daniel R. Ciarrocki and April M. Ferraro of Abrams & Bayliss; Brock E. Czeschin, Matthew D. Perri and Sarah A. Galetta of Richards, Layton & Finger; and Michael B. Carlinsky, Jennifer J. Barrett, Chad Johnson, Sylvia Simson, Silpa Maruri of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
Load Line is represented by Dale C. Christensen Jr. and Michael B. Weitman of Seward & Kissel and J. Clayton Athey and John G. Day of Prickett, Jones & Elliott.
The case is captioned In re Oxbow Carbon Unitholder Litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSolar Company: Restrictive Covenant Circumstances Require Chancery Blue Penciling
3 minute readDelaware Court Postpones Citgo Bid Hearing Until September as Venezuela Gets Close to Losing Oil Refiner
Climate-Change Lawsuits Are Spiking. Could They Be the Next Tobacco Litigation?
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250