AbbVie Ordered to Quickly Produce Docs in Humira Infringement Suit
The Feb. 8 ruling, from U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, came in response to Boehringer's second set of production requests pertaining to its "unclean hands" defense in Abbvie's infringement suit, which accuses the German drugmaker of trying to illegally capitalize on Humira's clinical success.
February 11, 2019 at 05:33 PM
4 minute read
Abbvie.
A federal magistrate judge has ordered AbbVie Inc. to promptly comply with an earlier command that it turn over documents related to an alleged campaign aimed at stymieing biosimilar competition to its $20 billion immunosuppressant Humira, warning against further efforts to throw “wrenches into the gears” of its high-stakes patent case against Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.
The Feb. 8 ruling, from U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, came in response to Boehringer's second set of production requests pertaining to its ”unclean hands” defense in Abbvie's infringement suit, which accuses the German drugmaker of trying to illegally capitalize on Humira's clinical success.
Lloret said that the corporate records Boehringer was seeking fell well within the scope of his previous order, and he mandated AbbVie's “rapid and punctilious compliance” by March 11.
“The time for wrangling over the contours of the requests, or of the deficiency categories noted by Boehringer, is past,” Lloret, who is visiting from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, wrote in a 10-page memorandum. “AbbVie chose to fight the 'unclean hands' discovery to the last ditch. I am declaring the fight over. AbbVie will produce the documents.”
Among its affirmative defenses in the case, Boehringer has alleged that AbbVie engaged in a “global effort” of pursuing overlapping and non-inventive patents in order to create a “patent thicket” that would delay competition for its blockbuster drug.
In June, Lloret said it remained to be seen whether Boehringer's theory would be viable as a patent defense. But Lloret said that question was best left until after discovery, and he ordered AbbVie to respond to Boehringer's request.
Boehringer, however, has grown frustrated with what it said was AbbVie's refusal to turn over the full range of materials covering its patenting program, including alleged attempts by AbbVie to increase its patent coverage for Humira and to suppress biosimilar competition. Abbvie countered that Boehringer had tried to broaden the scope of its original requests to documents unrelated to its unclean-hands defense, saying that further production would require additional and time-consuming searches.
Lloret said Feb. 8 that all of the documents Boehringer sought were relevant to its defense, which could be “potentially dispositive” to the case, and he rejected AbbVie's claims that discovery would take up too much time.
“AbbVie has already elected to spend its time resisting discovery. It litigated and lost, twice,” he said. “Months will not be absorbed with compliance.”
Bruce M. Wexler, an attorney for Boehringer, said Monday that he was “pleased with the careful attention given by the court to this issue of great importance.”
An attorney for AbbVie did not respond to a call seeking comment on the order.
AbbVie filed its suit in 2017 under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, a federal law that provides for expedited regulatory approval of drugs that are exceptionally similar to innovative products already being sold in the United States.
The Chicago-based drugmaker targeted just eight patents, but said it could assert dozens more if Boehringer tries to take its biosimilar to market. Boehringer has obtained approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for its copycat but has yet to launch the drug.
AbbVie, meanwhile, has been moving to protect its blockbuster product, which accounted for 65 percent of the company's total net revenues in 2017. According to filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the drug generated more than $18 billion in global sales in 2017, up 14.6 percent from the year before.
AbbVie has signaled that it hopes to increase worldwide sales of Humira to $21 billion by 2020. The company's updated financials for 2018 are expected to be released later this month.
The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, is captioned AbbVie v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals.
AbbVie is represented by William F. Lee, William G. McElwain and Amy K. Wigmore of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Michael P. Kelly and Daniel M. Silver of McCarter & English.
Boehringer is represented by Bruce M. Wexler, Eric W. Dittmann, Isaac S. Ashkenazi, Chad Peterman, Young Park and Carl Minniti of Paul Hastings and James D. Taylor Jr., Selena E. Molina, Christopher R. Hall and Andrea P. Brockway of Saul Ewing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Del. Drug Patent Fight Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Del. Drug Patent Fight](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fa/cd/37cca9a74a6aa5a23409d3be09d4/morin-frazier-raich-767x633.jpg)
Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Del. Drug Patent Fight
![Wilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict Wilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/delbizcourt/contrib/content/uploads/sites/394/2024/11/Luis-Li-767x633.jpg)
Wilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
![3rd Circuit Revives Fosamax MDL Over Questions of Preemption 3rd Circuit Revives Fosamax MDL Over Questions of Preemption](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2022/10/Philadelphia-James-Byrne-Courthouse-05-767x633.jpg)
![Chancery Again Rules in Plaintiff's Favor in Earnout Provision Dispute Chancery Again Rules in Plaintiff's Favor in Earnout Provision Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/394/2024/03/Delaware-Court-of-Chancery-1-767x633-1.jpg)
Chancery Again Rules in Plaintiff's Favor in Earnout Provision Dispute
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1State Bar Ethics Opinion Determines Texas Lawyers Can't Join a Firm With Non-Lawyer Partners
- 2'Don't Be Afraid:' AGs Push Against Trump's Immigration Policy
- 3State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
- 4Selendy Gay Files Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Workforce Reclassification EO
- 5Trump's DOJ Withdraws Opposition to Law Banning Trans Care for Minors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250