Strine Tells Del. Lawmakers to 'Think Boldly' About Funding for Downstate Court Buildings
Strine in recent years has made the plea a staple of his annual request to members of the General Assembly's Joint Finance Committee, the legislative panel panel tasked with writing the state's appropriations bills.
February 13, 2019 at 06:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr. on Wednesday called on lawmakers to “think boldly” in allocating funds for the Judiciary's biggest capital project, renewing calls to accelerate the construction of two new Family Court facilities in Kent and Sussex counties.
Strine in recent years has made the plea a staple of his annual request to members of the General Assembly's Joint Finance Committee, the legislative panel panel tasked with writing the state's appropriations bills.
Strine said the project, estimated to cost between $150 million and $200 million, was desperately needed to address security and other concerns at the current facilities, where there is no way to separate litigants, and judges are forced to use the same elevator as prisoners. But he warned Wednesday that if funding continues at current levels, it would take at least 10 years to complete the courthouse in Sussex County.
The lack of a comprehensive investment from the state, he said, was particularly frustrating, given the role of the legal services industry in propping up the formation of business entities—which accounts for 40 percent of the state's revenue.
“What we're urging you to do is to think boldly,” he said. “We can do this in a fiscally responsible way. It is our major industry.”
“If this was the Port, or this was Chemours, how many dollars would we throw at it per job? Well, we need to start looking at legal services in the same way, especially because when an industry is your number one producer of revenue, you might give it a little love.”
The Judiciary plans have the two courthouses in tandem, and in a similar design, in order to save on costs.
Officials have already started the process of buying land, and it is actively exploring the possibility of public-private partnerships to build and maintain the two courthouses. Strine said that approach could get the facilities built quicker, but it would also straddle the state with long-term obligations to pay them off.
Strine also acknowledged that the Family Court should have been incorporated into the Kent County Courthouse, saying the Judiciary held part of the blame
“If we put another floor on it and put the Family Court in there and had space for the [Justice of the Peace] Court, we would be done,” in Kent County, he said. “The Judiciary is part of the reason that didn't happen. We didn't always play well with each other.”
The JFC, which has been holding hearings with state agencies to mark up Gov. John Carney's recommended budget, does not authorize capital expenditures. That task is left to the Bond Committee, which is scheduled to hold similar meetings in April.
But Strine said the work of the two committees was intertwined and that the Judiciary planned to prevent a more concrete proposal to both panels in the near future.
As for the Judiciary's operating requests, Strine asked lawmakers to convert three contracted court interpreter positions to full-time, salaried jobs and to increase state funding for legal services to the poor.
Meanwhile, state Attorney General Kathy Jennings met with the same committee Wednesday to outline her budget priorities for the Department of Justice. Among her requests were proposals to increase the pay of DOJ lawyers and to have the state cover their required bar dues.
Jennings, who took office in January, also said she was preparing a loan forgiveness proposal to present next year as a tool for recruiting and retaining high-caliber attorneys.
Lawmakers are required to pass a final budget for the 2020 fiscal year by July 30.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDelaware Supreme Court Upholds Court of Chancery’s Refusal to Blue Pencil an Unreasonable Covenant Not to Compete
4 minute readLabaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Delaware Presence
Trending Stories
- 1Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
- 2Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
- 3Many Southeast Law Firms Planned New, Smaller Offices in 2024
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
- 5Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250