New Chancery Court Suit Targets Dell Over Stock Conversion Plan
The suit is the latest challenge to the transaction, which converted shares tied to Dell's interest in a valuable computer visualization firm into shares that tracked the business as a whole.
February 21, 2019 at 05:44 PM
4 minute read
A class of Dell Inc. investors have accused Michael Dell and Silver Lake Group LLC in Delaware Chancery Court of muscling through a share exchange transaction, which allegedly cost them billions of dollars and created a “windfall” for the company's controllers.
The suit, made public Wednesday, is the latest challenge to the transaction, which converted shares tied to Dell's interest in a valuable computer visualization firm into shares that tracked the business as a whole. According to the complaint, the compensation Dell offered for the valuable Class V stock was “nowhere near” the value of their stock, thanks in part to a bloated valuation of the company.
In the 88-page redacted filing, investors accused CEO Michael Dell and Silver Lake of setting up a “sham” special committee to oversee the proposal, only to then sideline the panel when stockholders pushed back on the deal.
According to the filing, Dell and Silver Lake threatened to pursue an initial public offering, followed by a forced conversion to Class C shares, if the Class V stockholders did not cooperate. That alternative, the complaint said, would be even more damaging to investors, and was enough to secure the approval of 61 percent of all Class V stockholder's at a special meeting in December.
At the time, Class V stock was consistently trading around $150 per share, but the plaintiffs said they only received $120 for each share that was converted. Even then, the complaint said, Dell's valuation of the Class C shares was premised on an “absurd overstatement” of Dell's core equity value and the “fanciful” notion that it had more than doubled from $19.5 billion to $48.4 billion immediately before negotiations commenced.
“Simply put, Dell printed its own money to pay for the transaction,” plaintiffs' attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Friedman Oster & Tejtel wrote in the complaint.
Dell's press shop did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The case is at least the fourth filed in Delaware, challenging actions taken by Michael Dell and Silver Lake, which took control of the Texas-based computer tech firm in a $25 million management buyout in 2013.
According to the complaint, Dell first announced a $109-per-share proposal last July, which was approved by a special committee tasked with evaluating the deal. The initial proposal, however, led to a “revolt” among investors, including a large activist investor that launched a campaign against the initial deal.
The lawsuit accused the special committee of essentially rubber stamping the proposed transaction and “standing idly by” as Dell and its financial advisers negotiated directly with a small group of stockholders. During the talks, the plaintiffs alleged, Michael Dell and Silver Lake eventually increased the offer to $120, while also using the threat of the the IPO and forced conversion as leverage over the investors
“While the special committee acted as a neutered bystander to the negotiations, Dell offered a small increase in consideration and put the Class V transaction to a coerced and uninformed vote,” the complaint said. “Unsurprisingly, given that the special committee had already stated its preference for the same deal at a lower price point, the special committee once again accepted the controllers' offer and recommended in favor of the transaction.”
The two-count complaint, initially filed Feb. 14, alleges breaches of fiduciary duty by both Dell's directors and its controllers, and seeks to recoup damages on behalf of stockholders.
The plaintiffs are represented by Chad Johnson, Noam Mandel and George Phillips of Quinn Emanuel and Jeremy S. Friedman and David F.E. Tejtel of Friedman Oster in New York. Ned Weinberger and Thomas Curry of Labaton Sucharow and Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer and David Sborz of Andrews & Springer in Wilmington are also listed as attorneys in the case.
An online docket-tracking service did not yet list counsel for the defendants.
The case, captioned Steamfitters Local 449 v. Dell, has been assigned to Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readAmazon Faces Similar Patent Suit Over Alexa, Echo Technology After $46.7M Jury Verdict Against It
3 minute readAntitrust Lawsuit Alleges Scheme to Block Digital-Wallet Competitors, Monopolize Cash Access at US Casinos
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250