New Chancery Court Suit Targets Dell Over Stock Conversion Plan
The suit is the latest challenge to the transaction, which converted shares tied to Dell's interest in a valuable computer visualization firm into shares that tracked the business as a whole.
February 21, 2019 at 05:44 PM
4 minute read
A class of Dell Inc. investors have accused Michael Dell and Silver Lake Group LLC in Delaware Chancery Court of muscling through a share exchange transaction, which allegedly cost them billions of dollars and created a “windfall” for the company's controllers.
The suit, made public Wednesday, is the latest challenge to the transaction, which converted shares tied to Dell's interest in a valuable computer visualization firm into shares that tracked the business as a whole. According to the complaint, the compensation Dell offered for the valuable Class V stock was “nowhere near” the value of their stock, thanks in part to a bloated valuation of the company.
In the 88-page redacted filing, investors accused CEO Michael Dell and Silver Lake of setting up a “sham” special committee to oversee the proposal, only to then sideline the panel when stockholders pushed back on the deal.
According to the filing, Dell and Silver Lake threatened to pursue an initial public offering, followed by a forced conversion to Class C shares, if the Class V stockholders did not cooperate. That alternative, the complaint said, would be even more damaging to investors, and was enough to secure the approval of 61 percent of all Class V stockholder's at a special meeting in December.
At the time, Class V stock was consistently trading around $150 per share, but the plaintiffs said they only received $120 for each share that was converted. Even then, the complaint said, Dell's valuation of the Class C shares was premised on an “absurd overstatement” of Dell's core equity value and the “fanciful” notion that it had more than doubled from $19.5 billion to $48.4 billion immediately before negotiations commenced.
“Simply put, Dell printed its own money to pay for the transaction,” plaintiffs' attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Friedman Oster & Tejtel wrote in the complaint.
Dell's press shop did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The case is at least the fourth filed in Delaware, challenging actions taken by Michael Dell and Silver Lake, which took control of the Texas-based computer tech firm in a $25 million management buyout in 2013.
According to the complaint, Dell first announced a $109-per-share proposal last July, which was approved by a special committee tasked with evaluating the deal. The initial proposal, however, led to a “revolt” among investors, including a large activist investor that launched a campaign against the initial deal.
The lawsuit accused the special committee of essentially rubber stamping the proposed transaction and “standing idly by” as Dell and its financial advisers negotiated directly with a small group of stockholders. During the talks, the plaintiffs alleged, Michael Dell and Silver Lake eventually increased the offer to $120, while also using the threat of the the IPO and forced conversion as leverage over the investors
“While the special committee acted as a neutered bystander to the negotiations, Dell offered a small increase in consideration and put the Class V transaction to a coerced and uninformed vote,” the complaint said. “Unsurprisingly, given that the special committee had already stated its preference for the same deal at a lower price point, the special committee once again accepted the controllers' offer and recommended in favor of the transaction.”
The two-count complaint, initially filed Feb. 14, alleges breaches of fiduciary duty by both Dell's directors and its controllers, and seeks to recoup damages on behalf of stockholders.
The plaintiffs are represented by Chad Johnson, Noam Mandel and George Phillips of Quinn Emanuel and Jeremy S. Friedman and David F.E. Tejtel of Friedman Oster in New York. Ned Weinberger and Thomas Curry of Labaton Sucharow and Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer and David Sborz of Andrews & Springer in Wilmington are also listed as attorneys in the case.
An online docket-tracking service did not yet list counsel for the defendants.
The case, captioned Steamfitters Local 449 v. Dell, has been assigned to Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmazon Faces Similar Patent Suit Over Alexa, Echo Technology After $46.7M Jury Verdict Against It
3 minute readAntitrust Lawsuit Alleges Scheme to Block Digital-Wallet Competitors, Monopolize Cash Access at US Casinos
Litigant Challenges Judge Connolly: Your Standing Orders on Disclosure Are Illegal, Misguided
Trending Stories
- 1Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
- 2Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
- 3Many Southeast Law Firms Planned New, Smaller Offices in 2024
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
- 5Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250