Investment Firm Says $25M AOL Appraisal Suit Belongs in Delaware
The suit, filed by Verition Partners Master Fund, accuses Chicago-based litigation services firm Coherent Economics of failing to disclose disparaging remarks that expert witness W. Bradford Cornell made about the firm's appraisal claims in a suit over the fair value of AOL Inc. after it was acquired by telecommunications giant Verizon in a $4.4 billion deal in June 2015.
March 14, 2019 at 04:17 PM
4 minute read
A Connecticut investment management firm is fighting to keep its $25 million fraud and breach-of-contract suit stemming from a high-profile Chancery Court appraisal case in Delaware, arguing that a proposed move to Illinois federal court would improperly deprive the firm of its chosen venue for litigation.
The suit, filed by Verition Partners Master Fund, accuses Chicago-based litigation services firm Coherent Economics of failing to disclose disparaging remarks that expert witness W. Bradford Cornell made about the firm's appraisal claims in a suit over the fair value of AOL Inc. after it was acquired by telecommunications giant Verizon in a $4.4 billion deal in June 2015.
According to court documents, Cornell had initially called the appraisal-seekers' appraisal case “shitty” in pretrial emails as he positioned himself to serve as Verizon's expert witness, but later flipped to the petitioner's side to settle a personal “grudge” when Verizon decided to hire a different expert to testify on its behalf.
In its complaint, Verition said the allegedly undisclosed comments were a “ticking time bomb” that eventually exploded at trial when company attorneys used them to attack Cornell's credibility on cross-examination. Verition claimed that the ordeal torpedoed its case and led Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III to value its AOL shares at $48.70, well below the $68.98 mark that Verition had argued for.
In a further blow to appraisal-seekers, Glasscock eventually scaled back the valuation to $47.08 last August, following post-trial briefing in the case.
Verition's suit, filed in Delaware federal court, sought $25.2 million in damages, plus $5.5 million in interest, that Verition said it would have received had Glasscock accepted its much higher valuation.
Cornell, Bradford and co-defendant San Marino Business Partners LLC moved last month to transfer the case to a federal court in Chicago, citing two lawsuits that claimed Verition had waived its claims as part of a settlement between Coherent and Verition's Grant & Eisenhofer attorneys in the appraisal case.
The defendants argued in a court filing that the venue change was warranted under Delaware's “first-filed rule,” which generally allows for cases to be transferred when related cases are already pending in a separate jurisdiction.
“In the prior-filed consolidated Illinois actions, defendants seek a declaratory judgment that the exact same claims asserted by Verition in the Delaware action were released and settled and confirmed in a written document,” defense attorneys from SFNR wrote in a Feb. 27 brief.
“As such, all of the claims and matters raised in the Delaware action can be resolved in a single proceeding in the Northern District of Illinois,” they said.
On Wednesday, Verition responded by calling the Illinois suits “anticipatory filings” meant to improperly “deprive Verition of its intended forum” in Delaware. The firm said that it had explicitly warned the defendants before they filed the Illinois cases that it was planning to file suit in Delaware over Cornell's “undisclosed bias and grudge.”
“From this correspondence, defendants knew that an action against them under Delaware law would be forthcoming. In these circumstances, the court should decline to apply the first-filed rule in favor of the anticipatory actions and instead maintain this case in Delaware, where it was intended,” Verition's Schlam Stone & Dolan attorneys wrote.
The attorneys also argued that “the critical facts underpinning” Verition's case had all occurred in Delaware, and only one of the five parties to the suit resided in Chicago.
Verition is represented by Erik S. Groothuis and Vera M. Kachnowski of Schlam Stone in New York and David A. Jenkins of Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins in Wilmington.
The defendants are represented by Norman T. Finkel, Richard M. Goldwasser, William R. Klein and Matthew P. Tyrrell of SFNR and Peter M. Spingola, Robert J. Shapiro and John M. Owen of Chapman Spingola in Chicago. Shaun Michael Kelly and Ryan Patrick Newell of Connolly Gallagher and Alexandra Rogin of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott are acting as local counsel.
The case, which has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Colm F. Connolly, is captioned Verition Partners Master Fund v. Cornell.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
- 2Many Southeast Law Firms Planned New, Smaller Offices in 2024
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
- 4Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
- 5‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250