Del. Chancery Lawsuit Accuses Cravath of Leading 'Sham' Auction in Grocery Store Sale to Apollo
“Cravath's task was to lend a patina of integrity to a sham auction,” claims a lawsuit against the M&A powerhouse.
March 19, 2019 at 02:51 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Cravath Swaine & Moore is facing a shareholder lawsuit alleging it helped a publicly-traded grocery chain conduct a “sham auction” that ensured it would be sold to private equity giant Apollo Global Management.
The allegation against one of the best-known law firm brands in M&A work was made in a complaint filed late last week in Delaware Chancery Court. Cravath was paid a $5.5 million flat fee for its representation of The Fresh Market board of directors in the company's nearly $1.4 billion cash sale to Apollo in late 2016, the suit says.
The broad allegations laid out in last week's lawsuit are not entirely new; the transaction had already been the focus of a shareholder lawsuit that was dismissed by a Delaware trial court in 2017. But the suit was revived by a Delaware appeals court ruling in July that said the company had failed to disclose facts suggesting The Fresh Market's founder preferred a sale to Apollo. Following discovery in that case, Cravath, The Fresh Market's general counsel Scott Duggan and JP Morgan Securities LLC were named as defendants in the case for the first time last week in an amended complaint.
The suit said The Fresh Market's founder, Ray Berry, preferred a sale to Apollo that his son, Brett, had estimated could net the Berrys a profit ranging from $136 million to $930 million. The Berrys owned roughly 10 percent of the company before its sale to Apollo and grew that equity stake to roughly 22 percent through Apollo's buyout, the suit says.
The suit says Cravath was hired to conduct an auction that was designed for the Berrys and Apollo to win. Damien Zoubek was the Cravath partner working on the acquisition, the suit said.
“Cravath's task was to lend a patina of integrity to a sham auction,” the lawsuit claims.
The suit alleges Cravath aided and abetted The Fresh Market's board in its breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders. Cravath helped The Fresh Market board compose a regulatory disclosure form that the suit claims omitted key facts about the Berrys' lack of interest in deals with suitors other than Apollo.
More specifically, the suit alleges Ray Berry had told Cravath that he would be reluctant to “roll over” his equity into a deal with a private equity firm other than Apollo. Without Berry's equity going toward its purchase, a competitor's bid would be more expensive than Apollo's plan. The disclosure form, known as a 14D-9, did not contain Berry's reluctance to put his equity on the line with another private equity bidder, the suit said.
Those aspects of the lawsuit were referenced in the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion that kept the case alive.
“The 14D-9 omits that, when asked by the Board's counsel [at Cravath] about an equity rollover with a party other than Apollo, Ray Berry's comments indicated that only Apollo would suffice,” the Delaware Supreme Court ruling said. “Such omission is material because, if disclosed, a reasonable stockholder might infer that Berry's expression of a clear preference for Apollo and reluctance to engage with other bidders hindered the openness of the sale process.”
In a statement, an Apollo spokesman said, “We believe the claims against Apollo have no merit, and we intend to defend the case vigorously.”
Zoubek, the Cravath partner, didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment, neither did spokespeople for the law firm and The Fresh Market. David Clarke, a partner at DLA Piper representing Ray Berry, did not immediately return a message seeking comment. The suit against Cravath was first reported by the Financial Times.
The shareholder class is represented by Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey Gorris and Christopher Quinn of Friedlander & Gorris in Wilmington. Plaintiffs' counsel also includes Randall Baron and Christopher Lyons of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDel. Supreme Court Unanimously Grants Another Shareholder Win Over Pre-Vote Disclosure
4 minute readTrump, Truth Social Attorneys Expect 'Solid' Chance at Shareholder Case Dismissal
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 2Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 33rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 4Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
- 5Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250