Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Targeting Cabela's Over Alleged 'Straw Purchase' of Gun
A Delaware Superior Court judge Friday dismissed a lawsuit from the family a slain Wilmington woman that sought to hold outdoor sporting goods retailer Cabela's civilly liable for allegedly selling the murder weapon in a "straw purchase."
March 29, 2019 at 04:27 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Delaware Superior Court judge Friday dismissed a lawsuit from the family of a slain Wilmington woman that sought to hold outdoor sporting goods retailer Cabela's civilly liable for allegedly selling the murder weapon in a “straw purchase.”
Judge Vivian L. Medinilla said in a 32-page memorandum opinion that Cabela's had followed the law when it sold a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson pistol to Brilena Hardwick on July 26, and thus was protected by a state statute, which shields gun-sellers from damages stemming from lawful transfers of firearms.
According to court documents, Hardwick immediately gave the gun to her boyfriend, John Kuligowski, who then sold it on the black market. The weapon was later used in a drive-by shooting near the home of 19-year-old Keshall “KeKe” Anderson. Anderson, the mother of a 6-month-old boy, was struck multiple times in the crossfire and later died of her injuries.
Anderson's family sued Cabela's last September, alleging that the retailer knowingly provided false information to a federal database when it certified that Hardwick was the actual purchaser of the gun. According to the lawsuit, Cabela's ignored a series of “red flags” that should have alerted the Bass Pro Shops subsidiary to the straw purchase and obligated the company to obtain more information to ensure that Hardwick was the real buyer.
Francis G.X. Pileggi, who represented Cabela's, argued that state law protected the company from damages caused by illegal transfers after a background check is conducted. Cabela's, he said, had complied with state and federal law and had no reason to suspect that Hardwick was making an illegal purchase.
On Friday, Medinilla said it only became clear during a police investigation that the information Hardwick provided to Cabella's was incorrect. At the time, the company ran a proper background check, received a response to proceed with the sale and “otherwise complied” with its duties under state and federal law.
“For these reasons, the court finds that in drawing all inferences in favor of the plaintiffs, at this juncture, they are not able to recover under a reasonably conceivable set of circumstances susceptible to the complaint,” she wrote.
Medinilla's opinion also rejected the plaintiff's constitutional arguments, finding that the law had not deprived the family of its right to recover damages. The statute, she said, still allowed them to sue Hardwick, Kuligowski or the actual shooters for compensation related to the shooting.
An attorney for the family said he was still reviewing the decision and declined to comment.
Pileggi, vice chair of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott's commercial litigation practice, said the ruling was a “fair and reasonable application of the law to the facts.”
“The facts were tragic, but that does not mean that Cabela's should be responsible for every sad occurrence,” he said in a statement. “Cabela's complied with all applicable laws and regulations, and could not be reasonably expected to know of the purchaser's illegal use of the gun, or the illegal use by the third person to receive that gun.”
According to court documents, Abdullah Brown and Deonta Carney, both 16, were arrested and charged in connection with the shooting
The News Journal reported earlier this year that a murder trial for Brown and Carney ended in a mistrial, after a juror failed to report for the second day of deliberations. Kuligowski was sentenced to 27 months for possessing a firearm while prohibited, the paper reported.
The family, which includes Anderson's young son and parents, were represented in the civil suit by Bruce L. Hudson of Hudson & Castle Law and Jonathan E. Lowy and Erin C. Davis of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in Washington, D.C.
Cabela's was also represented by James B. Vogts of Swanson, Martin & Bell in Chicago.
The case, in Delaware Superior Court, is captioned Summers v. Cabela's.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAlbertsons Gives Up on $25B Merger, Sues Kroger Seeking 'Billions of Dollars'
Amazon Sellers: Walmart Marketplace Supports Organized Retail Crime
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 13rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 2Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
- 3Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
- 4Many Southeast Law Firms Planned New, Smaller Offices in 2024
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250