Texas Company Agrees to $550,000 Settlement Over Subprime Auto Loans
The Delaware Department of Justice has reached a $550,000 settlement with a company accused of marketing subprime auto loans to hundreds of Delaware car buyers, Attorney General Kathy Jennings announced Monday.
April 08, 2019 at 05:54 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The Delaware Department of Justice has reached a $550,000 settlement with a company accused of marketing subprime auto loans to hundreds of Delaware car buyers, Attorney General Kathy Jennings announced Monday.
The DOJ said in a statement that Exeter Finance LLC had signed a cease and desist agreement, after a larger investigation revealed that it had facilitated car loans to consumers with poor credit. Under the agreement, which also included the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Texas-based Exeter will pay the state of Delaware $50,000 and ask major credit bureaus to wipe all trade lines on the credit reports of affected consumers, the department said.
“Protecting consumers from unfair lending practices is extremely important,” Jennings said. “Today's settlement with Exeter provides monetary relief to Delaware borrowers and repairs damaged credit.”
Exeter did not admit to breaking any state or federal laws and neither confirmed nor denied the allegations as part of the agreement. A company spokesman said Monday that Exteter was “pleased to have resolved this matter.”
“Exeter is committed to ensuring the highest standards of customer service in its business when delivering vital auto financing options to consumers,” the spokesman said.
The settlement with Exeter was part of Jennings' industrywide review of securitization practices in the subprime auto market. In March, the DOJ secured nearly $2.9 million from Santander Consumer Consumer USA Holdings Inc., another auto financier, for its role in financing similar loans.
“Our office will continue to investigate the subprime auto lenders to ensure that Delaware consumers receive a fair deal when they are extended credit to finance a purchase,” Jennings said.
According to the DOJ, subprime auto loans are often made through contracts signed at the car dealership, but funded by non-dealer financial institutions, like Exeter and Santander. As a part of the funding process, those institutions convert the loans to securities and fund them by selling investment notes.
Under the settlement, Exeter is required to pay $550,000 to an independent trust, which will be used to repay affected customers, as well as to cover the costs of implementation and the DOJ's investigation. An independent trustee, chosen by the DOJ and Exeter, would be responsible for administering the fund.
It will be up to the DOJ, however, to determine the amount of restitution provided to Delaware borrowers. The department is expected next month to provide the trustee with a list of consumers it believes are eligible for relief based on loans and certain subprime contracts that Exeter acquired between 2011 and 2015.
The case was handled by the DOJ's fraud division, which includes investor protection director Jillian Lazar, consumer protection director Christian Wright, Deputy Attorneys General William Green and Joseph Tabler, forensic accountant Clyde Hartman, and paralegal Courtney Patas. It was initiated by former investor protection director Owen Lefkon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
5 minute readTesla Shareholders Move to Consolidate Cases Over Musk's Focus on X, AI
4 minute read'When Does It End?' Chancellor Asks Defense Counsel in Dispute Over Musk Compensation
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250