The Delaware Court of Chancery recently issued an opinion that provides guidance for the application of extra-contractual principles in an earn-out context, further stressing the importance of precise drafting of earn-out provisions.

In Glidepath v. Beumer (C.A. No. 12220-VCL) (Feb. 21, 2019), the court refused to apply the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in an earn-out context where the subject at issue (the operation of the acquired company during the subsequent earn-out period) either could have been anticipated by the parties or was expressly covered by a contractual agreement between the parties. Additionally, the court found that when analyzing a potential breach of fiduciary duties in an earn-out context in a situation where the seller continues as an equity holder in the company, the conflicting interests arising from an earn-out arrangement (namely, the company’s interests in maximizing company value vs. the buyer’s interests in minimizing the earn-out payments) may give rise to the more stringent entire fairness standard of review.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]