Portion of Ex-Director's Claims Against Company Founder Avoids Laches Dismissal
A Delaware Chancery Court judge Thursday allowed the former director of a Delaware health information company to pursue claims that the firm's founder had cheated him out of stock options he was promised for joining the board in 2005.
April 25, 2019 at 05:05 PM
4 minute read
A Delaware Chancery Court judge Thursday allowed the former director of a Delaware health information company to pursue claims that the firm's founder had cheated him out of stock options he was promised for joining the board in 2005.
Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights III, however, dismissed a slate of other claims against CentriHealth Inc. and its board for an unreasonable delay, in a ruling that explored the boundaries of the equitable doctrine of laches.
While laches had barred some of plaintiff Richard Forman's claims, Slights found that the April 2018 complaint had established an initial case against CentriHealth founder and chairman Ralph Korpman for allegedly concealing from Forman that his stock options under a 2006 plan were no longer valid following Forman's resignation from the board.
According to the complaint, Korpman had promised Forman that his options would not terminate after he quit as a director in 2010, citing a “lack of corporate governance at the company.” It wasn't until 2017, Forman claimed, that the company told him in a letter from its lawyer that his options had actually expired seven years earlier.
In a 41-page memorandum opinion, Slights said that as CentriHealth's chairman and controlling stockholder, Korpman owed Forman a fiduciary duty to “act with honesty,” and credited assertions that that the founder's alleged lies had led Forman to believe that he was in no danger of forfeiting his rights at the time of his departure.
“Forman has well-pled that Korpman failed to fulfill that duty,” Slights wrote. “Whether and to what extent Forman's failure to inform himself of the terms of the CentriHealth stock option plan, either as a beneficiary of that plan or as a director who voted to approve the plan, will affect the viability of his claims, as a matter of laches or on the merits, are questions that must await further discovery to decide.”
But Forman did not fare as well with regard to claims that he had been swindled out of so-called “founder's shares,” which equated to a 1-percent stake in the firm, which was bought by UnitedHealth Group Inc. in 2017.
According to the opinion, a “pattern” emerged over the course of 11 years, where Forman would ask for confirmation that he owned the founder's shares, but Korpman would either avoid the question entirely or provide materials that were not responsive to the request. Sometimes, Slights said, Forman would wait years to repeat his inquiry, only to receive the same answer.
According to Slights, it should have been apparent to Forman no later than 2013 that the company had no intention of acknowledging his shares, making his claims “markedly untimely.”
“Forman knew well that the company had not acknowledged his claimed ownership of Founder's Shares; and yet he did nothing press his claim,” Slights said.
“Whether viewed as asserting a claim with unreasonable delay through the lens of the analogous statute of limitations or, more fundamentally, as a failure to act with vigilance when seeking equity, Forman's inexplicable delay in bringing his claims regarding the founder's shares cannot be countenanced.”
An attorney for Forman did not return a call seeking comment on the ruling, and counsel for Korpman and CentriHealth was not immediately available to comment.
Forman is represented by Michael A. Weidinger and Joanne P. Pinckney of Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce in Wilmington.
The defendants are represented by Bruce C. Doeg, John S. Hicks and Christopher E. Thorsen of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz in Nashville, Tennessee.
The case is captioned Forman v. CentrifyHealth.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
'I Don't Want to Die Fearfully': Outsiders Can't Get Help to Die in NJ
4 minute readNovo Nordisk Files Patent Claims to Fend off Generic Rivals of Wegovy
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250