Inmate Cleared of Murder in Third Trial Over Del. Prison Uprising, Marking New Setback for Prosecutors
Roman Shankaras, who had been portrayed by prosecutors of being the "puppet master" driving the plot to overtake the Smyrna prison, became the seventh inmate out of eight so far to avoid a murder convictions in the death of Lt. Stephen Floyd.
May 23, 2019 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Wilmington jury Thursday found Roman Shankaras not guilty of murder and all other charges stemming from the 2017 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, the latest defeat for state prosecutors in the high-profile case.
Shankaras, who had been portrayed by prosecutors of being the “puppet master” driving the plot to overtake the Smyrna prison, became the seventh inmate out of eight so far to avoid a murder convictions in the death of Lt. Stephen Floyd, a veteran corrections officer who was killed during the 18-hour siege.
Representatives of the Delaware court system confirmed the verdict shortly after it was read around 3 p.m.
Attorneys from the Delaware Department of Justice have been plagued in the case by conflicting witness testimony and a lack of physical evidence linking individual inmates to Floyd's death. To date, only one inmate has been found guilty, while prosecutors have struggled to prove their key theory of accomplice liability, which is typically considered a powerful tool for the state in complex criminal prosecutions.
In March, the DOJ announced that it would drop charges against six of the remaining nine defendants in the case, leaving just Shankaras and two other Vaughn prisoners left to stand trial on charges of murder, riot, conspiracy and kidnapping.
The DOJ declined to comment Thursday on the Shankaras verdict or the planned trials of inmates Lawrence Michaels and Alejandro Rodriguez-Ortiz, which are slated for October.
Patrick Collins, of Collins & Associates in Wilmington, who represented Shankaras at trial, said his client was ordered to be released from custody after serving out his sentence on his underlying conviction. If convicted of first-degree murder, he would have faced a mandatory sentence of life in prison.
“Both Roman and I are very thankful to the jury for all their hard work, and we're very relieved with the verdict,” Collins said.
Shankaras was originally included in the first group of inmates to be tried for Floyd's murder last fall, but was severed from the case over disagreements with the attorney that had been assigned to his defense.
A jury in the first trial convicted Dwayne Staats, who admitted to planning the takeover to protest prison conditions, on two counts of murder, as well as riot, kidnapping, assault and conspiracy. His co-defendants, Jarreau Ayers and Deric Forney, were both found not guilty of murder, though Ayers was convicted on the lesser charges. Forney, who denied any involvement in the uprising, was acquitted of all charges.
A second trial resulted in no guilty verdicts for any of the four inmates tried earlier this year.
Collins said that Shankaras was an outlier from the other cases because the state had not accused him of being “hands on” with any of the victims. Rather, prosecutors relied heavily on the testimony of its star witness, fellow inmate Royal Downs, who said Shankaras had been a “puppet master” during the takeover, directing the actions of other prisoners.
Under the theory of accomplice liability, prosecutors argued that since Shankaras was involved in carrying out the riot, he could also be convicted of any other foreseeable crimes that occurred as a result of that underlying offense.
“The state couldn't prove that beyond a reasonable doubt,” Collins said.
Two other guards were taken hostage and suffered serious injuries during the 2017 ordeal but were later released during negotiations with the Delaware State Police. A fourth victim, prison counselor Patricia May, was not injured and was eventually freed around 5 a.m. Feb. 2, when authorities stormed the building and finally ended the uprising.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJurden Announces 2025 Retirement, Capping 24 Years on Superior Court
3 minute readRare Opposition to Proposed Del. Corporate Law Changes Is Voiced to House Committee
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250