McKool Smith Win Puts Insurer on the Hook for $14M Settlement
After a now-defunct Tennessee probation company settled a class action for $14 million last year, its parent sued Illinois Union Insurance for the money. The insurer denied coverage, but a Delaware judge ruled Tuesday that a claimed exclusion does not apply.
July 11, 2019 at 03:24 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The insurer for a now-defunct private probation company in Tennessee has lost its bid to avoid covering more than $14 million the business paid to settle a 2015 class action accusing it of squeezing money from misdemeanor probationers through additional fines, fees and threats of jail.
Pathways Community Corrections Inc. and its parent, Providence Service Corp., settled the claims last year for more than $14.3 million, after spending more than $1 million in legal fees, and demanded that Illinois Union Insurance pony up the money under a $15 million excess coverage policy.
Illinois Union denied coverage, arguing that an earlier settlement of a 2011 lawsuit against Pathways involved “related professional incidents” and was thus excluded under the policy's terms. That suit involved claims that Pathways was illegally charging probationers a $5 “picture fee” and inflated supervisory fees, and settled the year it was filed, which was before the Illinois Union policy was purchased.
Providence filed a declaratory judgment action in Delaware Superior Court, and on Tuesday Judge Mary Johnston ruled that the exclusion does not let Illinois Union off the hook.
Johnston's ruling was filed under seal, but an excerpt released by McKool Smith, whose lawyers represent Providence, said the judge found the two incident so unrelated that to allow the exclusion to bar coverage would “render all claims involving [Pathways Community Corrections'] professional services 'related,'” resulting in coverage that was essentially “illusory.”
“It would be difficult, if not impossible, to find unrelated incidents in the context of providing probation services,” Johnston's order is quoted as saying.
Providence's lawyers include Robin L. Cohen, Adam Ziffer and Michelle Migdon of McKool's New York office and Kenneth Nachbar, John DiTomo and Sabrina Hendershot of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell in Wilmington. They were not at liberty to discuss the case.
Illinois National's counsel includes Deborah Minkoff and Abby Sher of Cozen O'Connor in Philadelphia and Joseph Bellew of White & Williams in Wilmington. They did not respond to requests for comment Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Misappropriation of Special Needs Trust Funds
Bumping the Bump-Up Exclusion: A Policyholder's Guide to Resisting Improper Coverage Denials
12 minute readLitigation Leaders: Cohen Ziffer Chair Talks the Advantages of Being on the Policyholder Side of the Insurance Recovery Practice
McElroy Deutsch Files Complaint for MetLife to Determine Policy's Proper Beneficiaries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250