Delaware Signs On to Facebook Antitrust Investigation
With 31 states announcing Tuesday they'd be joining an antitrust probe into social media giant Facebook, 47 states are now officially on board in saying they'd take part in the investigation.
October 22, 2019 at 02:15 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Thirty-one states Tuesday, including Delaware, officially signed onto the New York-led antitrust investigation into social media giant Facebook, joining dozens of others investigating whether the tech giant has hurt competition and limited consumer choice.
The move is the latest to put the regulatory spot on global technology companies' business practices, with efforts focusing on conglomerates such as Facebook and Google.
The investigation into Facebook's practices stems for a leadership team consisting of attorneys general from New York, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and the District of Columbia.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said 47 states have signed on to the investigation, with 39 doing so openly, while eight "cannot confirm their participating in pending investigations." James did not elaborate.
In addition to Delaware, those newly joining the investigation include attorneys general from Connecticut, Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Texas. They say their focus is on potential antitrust violations.
"Social media is a critical part of doing business in today's economy," Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a statement Tuesday. "Any effort by Facebook to unlawfully stifle competition could cause wide-ranging harm to smaller companies, restrict consumer choice, and increase costs for all."
"With Facebook's dominance comes an obligation to ensure they're not stifling competition," Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro tweeted Tuesday. "We'll follow the evidence and take any action necessary to protect consumers."
Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings added: "I am dedicated to protecting the rights of Delawarean consumers, which includes the right to participate in the Internet economy without fear of being taken advantage of by social media companies and other service providers."
And James said the initial investigation found Facebook "may have put consumer data at risk, reduced the quality of consumers' choices, and increased the price of advertising."
No one from Facebook's press office responded to a request for comment by press time.
The attorneys general investigation adds to mounting scrutiny. The Washington Post reported that James and others were also investigating Google's parent company, Alphabet Inc. And Reuters reported the U.S. Justice Department would be opening an antitrust investigation of Facebook.
Related stories:
Blocked Marketer and Facebook Agree to Dismiss Suit Over Privacy Backlash
In Cambridge Analytica Privacy Suit, Facebook Asks for Early Appeal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys, Professors Share Support for Chancellor Following Musk's Online Attacks
4 minute readJurden Announces 2025 Retirement, Capping 24 Years on Superior Court
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lavish 'Lies' Led to Investors Being Fleeced in Nine-Figure International Crypto Scam
- 2AstraZeneca Files Flurry of Lawsuits to Protect Cancer Treatment Drug
- 3American Airlines Legal Chief Departs for Warner Bros. Discovery
- 4New Montgomery Bar President Aims to Boost Lawyer Referral Service
- 5Deadline Extended for Southeastern Legal Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250