For Fashion Retailers, Chapter 11 Is in Vogue
In this issue of his Bankruptcy Update, Edward E. Neiger focuses on recent restructurings in the retail sector, including iconic luxury department store Barneys New York, fast-fashion juggernaut Forever 21 and specialty retailer Destination Maternity.
December 30, 2019 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
This issue of the Bankruptcy Update focuses on recent restructurings in the retail sector, including iconic luxury department store Barneys New York, fast-fashion juggernaut Forever 21 and specialty retailer Destination Maternity.
|Barneys New York
On Aug. 6, 2019, luxury retailer Barneys New York and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, in Barneys New York (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-36300).
Following a common theme in the retail industry, Barneys attributed its filing to online competition and drastic rent increases that resulted in a liquidity crisis. Initially founded as a men's retailer in 1923, the company grew to sell men's and women's clothing, shoes, accessories, cosmetics, fragrances and home décor at locations in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, Las Vegas and Seattle, as well as various discount warehouse locations and concept stores.
The debtors commenced their search for new financing or a buyer in June 2019 but were ultimately forced to file their Chapter 11 cases without a stalking horse commitment in place. To fund operations under Chapter 11, the company sought approval of a $217 million financing package to be funded by Brigade Capital Management and an affiliate of B. Riley Financial, with a substantial portion of the financing slated to roll-up prepetition secured debt held by the debtor-in-possession lenders. The financing arrangement drew the ire of the official committee of unsecured creditors for its limited new money component and onerous lending terms but was nevertheless approved by the bankruptcy court on a final basis Sept. 4, 2019.
On Oct. 17, 2019, the company announced that it secured a $271 million stalking horse commitment from an affiliate of Authentic Brands Group. Pursuant to the bidding procedures, additional bids were due Oct. 22, 2019, with an auction slated for Oct. 24, 2019 if additional qualified bids were received. On Oct. 31, 2019, the bankruptcy court approved the sale to Authentic Brands Group, who partnered with DIP lender B. Riley Financial on the deal. The sale resulted in the closure and liquidation of most Barneys' stores, including its Manhattan flagship and a licensing arrangement with Saks Fifth Avenue to create in-store Barneys branded boutiques.
Following the closing of the sale, Barneys filed its liquidating plan and accompanying disclosure statement which indicated that general unsecured creditors are unlikely to receive distributions under the plan. The bankruptcy court approved the disclosure statement Dec. 18, 2019.
|Forever 21
On Sept. 29, 2019, fast-fashion retailer Forever 21 and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, in Forever 21 (Bankr. D. Del. 19-12122).
The company, formed by husband and wife partners Jin Sook and Do Won Chang in 1981, attributed the bankruptcy filing to an overly aggressive international expansion plan that overestimated international demand as well as mounting rent obligations. The debtors reported that global sales dropped from a peak of $4.1 billion in 2014 to $3.1 billion in 2019. Through their Chapter 11 cases, the debtors are aiming to refocus operations in the United States and Latin America and emerge with just under 600 open stores.
To fund operations during the Chapter 11 proceedings, the debtors sought approval of a $350 million debtor-in-possession financing facility composed of a $275 million asset based lending facility and a $75 million term loan. On Nov. 5, 2019, the bankruptcy court authorized the debtors to access the full financing facility on a final basis.
On Nov. 17, 2019, the debtors filed their initial Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement. The plan is predicated upon the emergence of a plan sponsor, with proposals due Jan. 8, 2020. The plan contemplates that an as-yet unidentified plan sponsor will fund a plan sponsor investment in the form of cash, take-back notes, new equity or some combination thereof, the debtors will enter into an exit term loan facility to be provided by the plan sponsor and an exit ABL facility with a third party and general unsecured creditors will receive distributions in the form of cash, take-back notes, new equity or some combination thereof.
|Destination Maternity
On Oct. 20, 2019, specialty retailer Destination Maternity and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, in Destination Maternity (Bankr. D. Del. 19-12256)
The maternity apparel company attributed its Chapter 11 filing to continuing decline of the brick-and-mortar retail economy, declining birth rates, management turnover and prolonged revenue declines. As of the filing date, the debtors operated 998 retail locations across the United States and Canada under the names Motherhood Maternity, A Pea in the Pod and Destination Maternity. Prior to the commencement of their Chapter 11 cases, the debtors cut their marketing, general and administrative expenses by approximately 10% but could not take advantage of the savings as net sales dropped by nearly 12% during the same time period.
In Chapter 11, the debtors planned to run a going concern sale process simultaneously with targeted store closing sales. To finance their operations and sale process, the debtors obtained authority to utilize the cash collateral of their prepetition secured lenders, Wells Fargo Bank and Pathlight Capital.
On Dec. 12, 2019, Destination Maternity obtained court approval for an approximately $50 million asset sale to Marquee Brands and a joint venture of Gordon Bros. Retail Partners and Hilco Merchant Resources. The transaction provides for the liquidation of Destination Maternity's 235 stand-alone stores while the e-commerce platform and stores-within-stores will remain operational. Liquidation sales are expected to run through March 2020.
Edward E. Neiger is a co-managing partner at ASK LLP, a national law firm focusing on bankruptcy law. Marianna Udem, a partner at the firm, assisted in drafting this column. Neiger can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmazon Sellers: Walmart Marketplace Supports Organized Retail Crime
3 minute readLead Generator Wins $11.6M Verdict in 'David and Goliath' Contract Trial
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250