Chancery Court OKs Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Against Fresh Market's Ex-GC Over Buyout
Shareholders allege Scott Duggan omitted key pieces of information from a SEC filing ahead of Greensboro, North Carolina-based Fresh Market's $1.36 billion merger with private equity firm Apollo Global Management.
January 06, 2020 at 03:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Scott Duggan, former general counsel and senior vice president of The Fresh Market Inc., has failed to convince a judge to dismiss a breach of fiduciary duty claim he faces for his role in the publicly traded grocery chain's $1.36 billion buyout.
Delaware's Chancery Court found in a Dec. 31 decision that the allegations in a shareholder lawsuit could "conceivably support" a claim that Duggan was grossly negligent when he drafted and certified a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with Fresh Market's sale to private equity firm Apollo Global Management.
According to the court, the schedule 14D-9 filing in question—Fresh Market's response to Apollo's takeover bid—omitted the following key pieces of information:
- Fresh Market former chairman and CEO Ray Berry lied to the company's board about having reached a behind-the-scenes agreement with Apollo before the 2016 merger.
- Berry had expressed a "clear preference" for Apollo and was unwilling to consider offers from other firms.
- Berry indicated he might sell his shares in the company if it did not pursue the sale with Apollo.
- The "depth and breadth" of shareholder pressure to sell.
Vice chancellor Sam Glasscock noted in the opinion that the Delaware Supreme Court already held that the SEC filing "presents a distorted narrative." He wrote that based on Duggan's "role as general counsel, and given the sales process as pled, I can infer that the omitted facts were omitted with his knowledge.
"It is reasonably conceivable that crafting such a narrative to stockholders, while possessed of the information evincing its inadequacy, represents gross negligence on Duggan's part," he added.
"Of course, another reasonable interpretation is that the 14D-9 represents a good faith but failed effort to make reasonable disclosures," he wrote, "but given the pleading stage, I must choose the inference favoring the plaintiff."
An attorney for the shareholder class, Joel Friedlander of Friedlander & Gorris in Wilmington, Delaware, declined to comment on the decision. Attempts to reach Duggan and his attorneys at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, also in Wilmington, were unsuccessful.
While Glasscock denied Duggan's motion to dismiss, he also rejected the shareholders' claim that Duggan was motivated to complete the "sham sale" to Apollo because he stood to receive $1.2 million in single-trigger equity-based compensation and another $1.1 million if he were terminated after the merger.
"The fact that Duggan remained with the company following the transaction suggests his double-trigger compensation was not a motive," Glasscock wrote.
Glassock also cast aside an argument that Duggan breached his fiduciary duty by failing to sufficiently question Berry about his relationship with Apollo.
"It may have been wise to explore further. Failure to do so may have been poor lawyering," Glasscock wrote. "Given the circumstances and inquiries Duggan made, however, I do not find the plaintiff has pleaded facts supporting gross negligence. Prompted by Apollo's offer, Duggan investigated, received Berry's account, reported it to the Board, and Berry confirmed it."
Duggan parted ways with the Greensboro, North Carolina-based Fresh Market in March 2019 and joined Carter's Inc. in Atlanta, where he serves as senior vice president of corporate and legal affairs, general counsel and corporate secretary for the children's clothing company, according to his LinkedIn profile.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDelaware Supreme Court Upholds Court of Chancery’s Refusal to Blue Pencil an Unreasonable Covenant Not to Compete
4 minute readChancery Stays Action Pending Resolution of a Motion to Dismiss in a First-Filed Action to Which the Defendant Is Not a Party
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Sanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
- 2Roberts Calls Court's Relationship With Congress 'Strained.' Who's to Blame?
- 3Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
- 4Buchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
- 5$2M Settlement for Woman Struck by New Jersey Transit Bus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250