Chancery Court OKs Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Against Fresh Market's Ex-GC Over Buyout
Shareholders allege Scott Duggan omitted key pieces of information from a SEC filing ahead of Greensboro, North Carolina-based Fresh Market's $1.36 billion merger with private equity firm Apollo Global Management.
January 06, 2020 at 03:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Scott Duggan, former general counsel and senior vice president of The Fresh Market Inc., has failed to convince a judge to dismiss a breach of fiduciary duty claim he faces for his role in the publicly traded grocery chain's $1.36 billion buyout.
Delaware's Chancery Court found in a Dec. 31 decision that the allegations in a shareholder lawsuit could "conceivably support" a claim that Duggan was grossly negligent when he drafted and certified a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with Fresh Market's sale to private equity firm Apollo Global Management.
According to the court, the schedule 14D-9 filing in question—Fresh Market's response to Apollo's takeover bid—omitted the following key pieces of information:
- Fresh Market former chairman and CEO Ray Berry lied to the company's board about having reached a behind-the-scenes agreement with Apollo before the 2016 merger.
- Berry had expressed a "clear preference" for Apollo and was unwilling to consider offers from other firms.
- Berry indicated he might sell his shares in the company if it did not pursue the sale with Apollo.
- The "depth and breadth" of shareholder pressure to sell.
Vice chancellor Sam Glasscock noted in the opinion that the Delaware Supreme Court already held that the SEC filing "presents a distorted narrative." He wrote that based on Duggan's "role as general counsel, and given the sales process as pled, I can infer that the omitted facts were omitted with his knowledge.
"It is reasonably conceivable that crafting such a narrative to stockholders, while possessed of the information evincing its inadequacy, represents gross negligence on Duggan's part," he added.
"Of course, another reasonable interpretation is that the 14D-9 represents a good faith but failed effort to make reasonable disclosures," he wrote, "but given the pleading stage, I must choose the inference favoring the plaintiff."
An attorney for the shareholder class, Joel Friedlander of Friedlander & Gorris in Wilmington, Delaware, declined to comment on the decision. Attempts to reach Duggan and his attorneys at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, also in Wilmington, were unsuccessful.
While Glasscock denied Duggan's motion to dismiss, he also rejected the shareholders' claim that Duggan was motivated to complete the "sham sale" to Apollo because he stood to receive $1.2 million in single-trigger equity-based compensation and another $1.1 million if he were terminated after the merger.
"The fact that Duggan remained with the company following the transaction suggests his double-trigger compensation was not a motive," Glasscock wrote.
Glassock also cast aside an argument that Duggan breached his fiduciary duty by failing to sufficiently question Berry about his relationship with Apollo.
"It may have been wise to explore further. Failure to do so may have been poor lawyering," Glasscock wrote. "Given the circumstances and inquiries Duggan made, however, I do not find the plaintiff has pleaded facts supporting gross negligence. Prompted by Apollo's offer, Duggan investigated, received Berry's account, reported it to the Board, and Berry confirmed it."
Duggan parted ways with the Greensboro, North Carolina-based Fresh Market in March 2019 and joined Carter's Inc. in Atlanta, where he serves as senior vice president of corporate and legal affairs, general counsel and corporate secretary for the children's clothing company, according to his LinkedIn profile.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
6 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Upholds Court of Chancery’s Refusal to Blue Pencil an Unreasonable Covenant Not to Compete
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 2Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 3Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 4Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
- 5Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250