Del. Superior Court Suspends Jury Trials, Chancery Court Postpones In-Person Hearings
As the coronavirus threat continues, the Delaware Superior Court has suspended all criminal and civil trials through April 15 and the Chancery Court has ordered that, for the next 30 days, all hearings and trials either be conducted electronically or be continued.
March 16, 2020 at 04:56 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
As the coronavirus threat continues, the Delaware Superior Court has suspended all criminal and civil jury trials through April 15 and the Chancery Court has ordered that, for the next 30 days, all hearings and trials either be conducted electronically or be continued.
Both orders are subject to to further review once they expire.
The orders from both courts, effective Monday, came after the state Supreme Court issued an order declaring a judicial emergency. The high court's order gave all trial courts in the state the flexibility to continue trials and hearings in civil and criminal cases for 30 days.
The order also urged courts to use audiovisual devices to conduct proceedings other than jury trials and tolled all time requirements under the Speedy Trial Guidelines.
"I signed this emergency declaration after the President of the United States and the governor of the State of Delaware declared national and state emergencies, and only after careful consideration by the Delaware Supreme Court and the other state courts," Chief Justice Collins Seitz Jr. said in a press release accompanying the judicial emergency order. "The judicial branch also heard from our justice partners about the urgent need to alter the way we handle criminal and civil cases in the Delaware courts. Declaring a judicial emergency is needed to protect our state employees and the public from the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The emergency declaration will be revisited every 30 days, or earlier if circumstances change or the public health emergency has passed."
Also on Monday, the Supreme Court issued an order suspending the requirement that attorneys file paper copies of documents are also electronically submitted.
Read the Superior Court's and Chancery Court's orders below:
Superior Court
Chancery Court
For information and updates on the judiciary's response to COVID-19, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Judges Zero In on Constitutional Challenges to Medicare Drug Pricing Program
Justices: Can Delaware Courts Put a Price Tag on Corporate Move to Nevada?
4 minute readSupreme Court Asked If Ellison's Plans Affected Oracle's NetSuite Acquisition
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250