Federal Court Rules Counsel Can't Authorize Student Loan Trust Settlement
Seven intervening parties opposed the proposed consent judgment, which would, if approved, have required the trusts to pay a minimum of $19.1 million in penalties and refunds.
June 08, 2020 at 06:38 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has denied the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's proposed $19.1 million-plus settlement with 15 Delaware student loan trusts, holding that the trust agreements didn't allow a law firm to sign off on the judgment's execution.
In a decision filed May 31 and unsealed June 3, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika of the District of Delaware wrote that in order for the settlement to go forward, it would instead have to be approved directly by owner trustee, Wilmington Trust Co.
As part of an investigation of alleged unfair loan practices and an audit of 800,000 student loans, the CFPB first brought action against the trusts, collectively known as the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts, on Sept. 18, 2017. The bureau moved for approval of a proposed consent judgment the same day.
Seven intervening parties opposed the proposed consent judgment, which would, if approved, have required the trusts to pay a minimum of $19.1 million in penalties and refunds.
The judgment was approved by McCarter & English, a law firm representing the trusts. The case was bifurcated, and the CFPB and interveners briefed the court on two threshold issues: whether McCarter & English had the authority to sign the proposed consent judgment on the trusts' behalf and whether it was improper, authority notwithstanding, for counsel to enter into the proposed consent judgment.
According to the decision, the trusts' owners had originally directed Wilmington Trust Co. to authorize the settlement, but the company resisted doing so.
Citing a section of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act that states a trust can only be under the direction of its trustees, unless otherwise specified in an agreement, Noreika determined that while the owners' consent is required to settle claims against the trusts, the owner trustee is the only entity, based on the existing trust-related agreements in the case, that would be authorized to approve a settlement, and the Wilmington Trust Co. had not delegated its power to the owners or McCarter & English.
Additionally, Noreika found McCarter didn't have authority to execute the proposed consent judgment due to not having approval from one intervener. The trust agreement for the Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust I, known as the Master Trust, differed from the agreements with the other 14 trusts involved in that, in order for a settlement agreement to be executed, written approval from its note insurer, Ambac Assurance Corp., was required in addition to owner approval.
The court's decision did not address the other arguments raised on the threshold issues.
McCarter & English's Wilmington office and CFPB's media office did not respond to requests for comment on the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTX Estate Seeks to Recoup $1.76B From Binance, Plus Exec 'Piggy Bank' Payouts
3 minute readWells Fargo Seeks Declaratory Judgment Against 'YGC' Debt Collection Copyright Claim
4 minute readAntitrust Lawsuit Alleges Scheme to Block Digital-Wallet Competitors, Monopolize Cash Access at US Casinos
Securities Litigation Cases Continued to Decline Nationally in 2023, Report Finds
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250