The Delaware Supreme Court’s MFW decision provides a safe harbor for controlling stockholder buyouts that are conditioned upon approval of a special committee of independent directors and a majority-of-the-minority vote, provided, inter alia, “there is no coercion of the minority.” Kahn v. M & F Worldwide (MFW), 88 A.3d 635, 645 (Del. 2014). The Delaware Court of Chancery’s recent decision in In re Dell Technologies Class V. Shareholders Litigation, (Del. Ch. Jun. 11, 2020), held that a redemption of minority stockholders’ shares failed to satisfy MFW due to the company’s decisions to give the special committee an impermissibly narrow mandate and then bypass it to negotiate directly with minority stockholders. The court also found that, in light of the looming threat of undesirable alternative transaction, the company’s offer was impermissibly coercive.
The Transaction: Dell’s Class V Stock Redemption
Following a 2013 going-private transaction, a majority of the voting power of Dell Technology Inc. (Dell) was controlled by Michael Dell and his affiliates. He also controlled board votes via a director seat with super-voting rights.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]