IRS Seeks $1.5 Billion Judgment in Tax Case Against Altaba, Which Claims Number Is Inflated
After revising the claim once and then a second time after Altaba filed its 2019 income tax return in April, the IRS told Altaba it owed $1.5 billion in unassessed income and employment tax liabilities.
June 18, 2020 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. government took legal action Tuesday in an attempt to collect the $1.5 billion it says Yahoo successor Altaba Inc. owes in taxes.
Counsel for Altaba, a Delaware corporation operating out of New York, wrote in a May Delaware Court of Chancery petition that the Internal Revenue Service's claim is inflated, with about $659 million being the amount the company is willing to hold back for federal tax liabilities while finalizing the dissolution its board agreed to last year.
Yahoo changed its name to Altaba in 2017 shortly after selling its internet operating business. The corporation was formerly dissolved within Delaware on Oct. 4, 2019, and reported the dissolution to the IRS several days later. It's currently not conducting any business other than what's required to wrap up the dissolution.
Altaba filed a petition May 28 asking the Delaware Court of Chancery to determine security amounts it should hold back to cover claims expected to come up during its dissolution. Among the known claims listed in the petition was the Internal Revenue Service's claim, which was first presented in December as $12.7 billion for tax years ranging from 2013 to 2029. Soon after, Altaba made about $5.76 billion in payments toward the claim for 2019 taxes. In February, the dissolved corporation notified the IRS it was rejecting part of the dissolution claim but reportedly did not specify which part.
After revising the claim once and then a second time after Altaba filed its 2019 income tax return in April, the IRS told Altaba it owed $1.5 billion in unassessed income and employment tax liabilities.
The federal government removed its case to the District of Delaware on Tuesday, asking the court to reduce the tax liability to a judgment of $1.5 billion plus interest and statutory additions, nearly all of which is stated to be for income tax liability. The Department of Justice's Office of Public Affairs had no comment on the case Thursday.
"Altaba submits that, while the parties have made substantial progress on their discussions, the tax claims asserted by the IRS remain inflated and do not reflect amounts that the IRS would actually seek from Altaba after the IRS has fully considered the facts and circumstances regarding the tax matters in discussion," Altaba's attorney, Paul J. Lockwood, of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, wrote in the Court of Chancery petition.
Lockwood, who did not respond for comment on the case, wrote that Altaba's petition is unusual in that while the company is being dissolved, it has assets in excess of what is expected to be necessary to pay out dissolution claims and plans to divide billions among stockholders. The company now has about $13 billion in assets, nearly all of which has been liquidated.
Altaba has requested the Court of Chancery make claim determinations in two steps in order to begin distributing funds not earmarked as possibly being needed to resolve claims to stockholders. The suggested process would involve Altaba first setting aside the full amounts requested by the various claimants, as well as a $250 million "cushion" for future claims, then negotiating the claims for which an agreement has not already been reached.
Claimants with which Altaba reported disputes included Verizon, which is requesting a $3.5 billion holdback, a number Lockwood wrote incorrectly includes duplicate costs for tax liabilities and a class action lawsuit addressed by other claims.
Documents filed with the Court of Chancery indicate Altaba plans to maintain a reserve of $7.3 billion for various claims and expenses, including an estimated $99.6 million in wind-down costs, but predicts about $1.4 billion of that reserve will ultimately be used.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circ Orders SEC to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readElon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
5 minute readCompanies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Kramer Levin's Patent Trial Team Discusses Teaching Tech to Juries
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250