Knights of Columbus Sue Rehoboth Beach Over Nativity Scene Ban
The lawsuit claims Rehoboth Beach allows secular holiday displays on city property, but not religious displays.
June 25, 2020 at 02:37 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Rehoboth Beach's ban on allowing a Christmas nativity scene on public property has ended up in federal court, where the local Knights of Columbus argue the city's stance violates their civil rights.
Rehoboth Beach allows secular holiday displays on city property, and the Catholic group asserted the city shouldn't have been permitted to ban religiously affiliated displays specifically for being religious.
The Knights of Columbus Star of the Sea Council said the policy violates the First and 14th amendments. The lawsuit filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware also names Mayor Paul Kuhns and City Manager Sharon Lynn.
Roger Byron, of the First Liberty Institute, who is representing the Knights of Columbus, said the city is openly defying the law.
"Two things are crystal clear: One, it's perfectly lawful to have a crèche or a nativity on public property," Byron said. "It is blatantly unlawful to ban religious displays from public property. That is, inarguably, a violation of the First Amendment."
Historically, various Christmas-themed displays have appeared annually on Rehoboth Beach's public Bandstand Circle and boardwalk, including a nativity scene, Christmas tree, light displays and the "Santa's house," the latter of which is put up by the Rehoboth Beach and Dewey Beach Chamber of Commerce, a private organization.
"The city's actions were thoughtful, inclusive and observant of the rights embodied in the U.S. Constitution," a statement released Thursday from the city of Rehoboth Beach read. "Accordingly, the city intends to aggressively defend the uninformed lawsuit filed by the Knights of Columbus.
A crèche has been displayed in the Bandstand Circle since the 1930s, the complaint states. It was previously put up by the Kiwanis Club of Coastal Delaware, but the Knights of Columbus took on that role in 2018.
According to the complaint, the Knights' understanding, based on conversation with Kuhns and Lynn, was that they could put up a nativity scene that year as long as other religious entities were given the chance to put up displays of their own. They put the crèche at Bandstand Circle after reportedly asking other churches and the Seaside Jewish Community Center if they wanted to participate, though none opted to do so.
The day after the crèche was put up, the complaint states Lynn called Saint Edmond Church, with which the Knights of Columbus are affiliated, and demanded it be taken down, a mandate the church complied with.
The issue was discussed at later City Board of Commissioners' meetings, where Kuhns and Lynn allegedly the crèche would not be allowed because it is a religious symbol, according to the lawsuit. Kuhns said having any religiously affiliated holiday displays on public property was against city policy, and in October 2019, Lynn allegedly informed the church that the Chamber of Commerce was offering its property half a mile away from the Bandstand Circle as an alternative site. The Knights' request to have the crèche placed near the Santa's house was denied by Lynn in December.
In their complaint, the Knights of Columbus assert that because the Chamber of Commerce is allowed to display a secular holiday scene, not allowing them to set up a religious holiday display publicly shows viewpoint and religious discrimination and violates the Knights' constitutional right to freely exercise their religion.
"In the action, the Knights of Columbus failed to acknowledge that the city collaborated with both religious and secular groups within the community to secure a prominent location for the placement of religious and secular displays during the holiday season," Rehoboth Beach's statement said. "Those efforts, which the city intends to repeat during the 2020 holiday season, delicately balance the constitutional rights of all relating to religion and speech established by the First Amendment."
As of Thursday morning, the defendants were not officially represented by counsel.
The Knights of Columbus are also represented by Michael P. Morton of Morton, Valihura & Zerbato in Greenville, as well as Christopher DiPompeo and Kaytlin L. Roholt of Jones Day in Washington, D.C.
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJurden Announces 2025 Retirement, Capping 24 Years on Superior Court
3 minute readRare Opposition to Proposed Del. Corporate Law Changes Is Voiced to House Committee
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250