NLRB Says It Will Review Plan for Union Decertification Election at Delaware Poultry Plant
The board will consider whether about 800 employees at Selbyville-based Mountaire Farms Inc., represented for collective bargaining purposes by employee Oscar Cruz Sosa, are allowed under contract to vote to decertify from the United Food and and Commercial Workers.
June 26, 2020 at 03:37 PM
3 minute read
The National Labor Relations Board announced Tuesday it will allow voting in a union decertification election to continue as it considers whether to apply a union contract doctrine to the election proposed by a Delaware poultry worker.
The board will consider whether about 800 employees at Selbyville-based Mountaire Farms Inc., represented for collective bargaining purposes by employee Oscar Cruz Sosa, are allowed under contract to vote to decertify from the United Food and and Commercial Workers Local 27 union.
The union, represented by attorneys Christopher Ryon and Joel Smith of Kahn, Smith & Collins in Baltimore, argued an election is barred by the board's contract ban. Under that ban, an election involving an existing union contract cannot be held until the contract expires or until three years have passed since it was signed. Ryon and Smith were not immediately available for comment on Friday.
Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation, which is providing legal representation for Cruz Sosa, said Friday he doesn't expect the board's decision will be made quickly and that the Mountaire Farms employees' contract with UFCW isn't subject to generally used election restrictions such as the contract bar because it's invalidated by language requiring union dues to be paid immediately, rather than by the end of a 30-day grace period.
Cruz Sosa has also asked the board to use the case to narrow the non-statutory contract bar at the national level, arguing it infringes on employees' right under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act to determine if they want to be part of a union or not.
The case was first filed with the board in February. In April, NLRB Region Five Director Sean R. Marshall determined the Mountaire Farms employees would be permitted to vote on whether or not they wanted to continue with their union representation.
Ballots for the election were mailed out at 3 p.m. Tuesday. Just over an hour later, the NLRB announced it would stay the election while it considered the alleged contract bar issue. It was determined that while the ballots would be mailed and collected as planned through mid-July, they are expected to remain in safekeeping, untallied, until the NLRB determines whether the election can be considered valid.
"We believe the election should go forward because these elections are basically capturing a slice in time: these are the views of the employees at this moment," Mix said. "And so the longer this goes on, who knows as the employment changes and the situation changes? We want to make sure that the employees exercise their rights under Section 7."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
6 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
FTC Goes After AI Tool That Has Capability to Mass Produce Fake Reviews
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 2Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 3Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 4'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 5New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250