5 Delaware Firms Were Awarded $1M or More in PPP Loans, With 200 Others Receiving Smaller Sums
Of the 725 specific categories into which businesses receiving PPP loans were grouped, law offices received more individual loans in Delaware than all but seven, according to data recently released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Small Business Administration.
July 29, 2020 at 06:39 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Five Delaware law firms have been awarded more than $1 million from the federal Paycheck Protection Program so far, with more than 200 others in the state receiving smaller loans.
Of the 725 specific categories into which businesses receiving PPP loans were grouped, law offices received more individual loans in Delaware than all but seven, according to data recently released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Small Business Administration.
Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy, Morris James and Potter Anderson & Corroon were all loaned between $2 million and $5 million, while Ashby & Geddes and Bayard each received loans of between $1 million and $2 million. Those loans were approved between April 7 and April 15.
Stuart Grant, co-founder and managing partner of legal finance company Bench Walk Advisors, said Tuesday he hadn't necessarily expected to see larger law firms around the country applying for and being granted PPP funding.
"I was shocked to find out that my biggest competition is actually the United States government making loans to law firms. And they dwarf me both in the volume of loans that they've made and the amount of those loans," Grant said. "I thought PPP was supposed to be used sort of as the last alternative, and clearly it has not been, because I saw the law firms on those lists, and I would've been happy to lend to a lot of them."
A total of 12,504 PPP loans were awarded in Delaware, more than 10,000 of which were for less than $150,000. For loans of $150,000 or more, the SBA provides a range in which each particular loan falls, rather than a specific dollar amount, with loans falling into one of five ranges, from between $150,000 and $350,000 at the lowest end to between $5 and $10 million at a maximum.
"Law firms were deemed essential in Delaware and funds have been used to support efforts to sanitize offices, purchase PPE for employees and staff, and enhance our remote work capabilities, as well as continue to cover operational expenses during unprecedented market conditions," said a statement from Morris James. "Our employees deserve all that we can do to maintain their health and safety and our clients rely on us for superior legal counsel without disruption. The PPP loan has supported our ability to accomplish both without additional adversity."
Paul A. Bradley of Maron Marvel declined to comment on specific details about his firm's loan amount or how it has been distributed but said in an email Wednesday afternoon that the funding was used to pay salaries, rent and other costs in compliance with the PPP's guidelines. SBA data showed the firm indicated 192 jobs would be retained with PPP funding.
"Our firm is a grateful recipient of PPP funds, which allowed us to preserve nearly 200 jobs, thereby protecting our employees and ensuring that we could continue to serve our clients uninterrupted," Bradley said.
Altogether, 208 Delaware law offices were awarded a total of somewhere between $19.23 million and $48.83 million in PPP loans, with 53 falling into one of the loan categories at or above $150,000. For comparison, schools and all other education-related services in Delaware were loaned a total of between $23.05 million and $54.2 million.
At 515, full-service restaurants were given more loans than any other business category in the state, followed by miscellaneous retailers, physicians' offices, real estate and brokerage offices, miscellaneous personal services, religious organizations and limited-service restaurants, then legal offices.
Grant said small firms with a handful of attorneys might not be large enough for private financiers to cover but that PPP has also generated more business for Bench Walk Advisors.
"There have been other firms who have actually come to us and said, 'Look, we don't want to take government loans; we don't think we should or we don't qualify. We don't want the baggage that goes with it,'" Grant said, adding he'll be interested to see if firms repay PPP loans or if they'll ask for loan forgiveness.
Attorneys with Potter Anderson declined to comment on the specific size of the loan the firm received or how it is being used.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
6 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
FTC Goes After AI Tool That Has Capability to Mass Produce Fake Reviews
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250