The Delaware Supreme Court has issued a first-impression opinion outlining what procedures state agencies need to follow to have an administrative subpoena enforced by the Court of Chancery.

The opinion, written by Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr., upholds the Court of Chancery’s finding last year that a request for AT&T escheat records by the Delaware Department of Finance was overly broad and therefore had to be quashed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]