A plaintiff seeking to bring derivative claims on behalf of a Delaware corporation bears a heavy burden if she has not made demand and seeks to demonstrate that demand would be futile based on directors’ alleged substantial risk of personal liability from approving the transaction under attack. When the subject company’s certificate of incorporation includes a provision exculpating directors for liability for monetary damages to the fullest extent of Delaware law, a plaintiff’s burden is even harder, as she must plead particularized facts showing bad faith, a standard that requires a showing of intentional misconduct. As demonstrated in Equity-League Pension Trust Fund v. Great Hill Partners, C. A. No. 2020-0992-SG (Del. Ch. Nov. 23, 2021), a mere failure to ask for additional information will not suffice to show the directors’ conduct was against the corporate interest if the pleaded facts do not otherwise reflect a “we don’t care about the risks” attitude in approving the transaction.

Background to Transaction

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]