CVS pharmacy and convenience store in Baltimore, Aug. 8, 2020. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM Superior Court: CVS Didn't Prove Insurance Case Caused 'Overwhelming Hardship' in Delaware
Superior Court Judge Paul Wallace denied CVS' motion to dismiss or stay an action from its insurers, which seek to avoid paying for the retailer's defense in litigation claiming it fueled and profited from the opioid epidemic.
August 12, 2022 at 02:41 PM
3 minute read
Insurance
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Insurers can continue with their case in Delaware seeking to avoid paying for CVS Health Corp.'s opioid-related defense, a Superior Court judge ruled Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
