Fox News Agrees to Pay $787M to Settle Dominion Defamation Claim, Averting Long-Awaited Trial
The reported settlement sum is about half of Dominion's public demand of $1.6 billion in damages.
April 18, 2023 at 04:35 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Dominion Voting Systems Corp. is set to receive $787.5 million under a settlement with Fox News that averted a long-awaited trial Tuesday.
Rather than giving statements opening a six-week trial as planned, attorneys for Dominion Voting Systems announced that Fox had agreed to a resolution of the Canada-based company's defamation claims.
"Money is accountability. We got that today from Fox," said Stephen Shackelford of Susman & Godfrey, lead counsel for Dominion in the case that was filed over two years ago seeking $1.6 billion. "We're not done yet. We've got some other people that have got some accountability coming towards them."
Two and a half hours after opening statements were set to begin, Judge Eric Davis of the Delaware Superior Court called in the jury. Voir dire had taken up the bulk of the morning session in court.
"The parties have resolved their case, and that means your service is done," he said. "Without you, the parties would not have been able to resolve this situation."
Attorneys did not comment on whether the settlement includes any non-monetary elements.
"We acknowledge the court's rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false," Fox said in a statement issued after the settlement was announced. "This settlement reflects Fox's continued commitment to the highest journalistic standards. We are hopeful that our decision to resolve this dispute with Dominion amicably, instead of the acrimony of a divisive trial, allows the country to move forward from these issues."
The trial, which was slated to last six weeks, would likely have featured much-anticipated testimony from Fox News CEO Rupert Murdoch and high profile hosts like Tucker Carlson. Those appearances were averted by the last-minute accord.
"I think this is the best lawyering I've had, ever," said Davis, who has spent 13 years on the bench.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSmartmatic, Newsmax Warned Against 'Fighting Over Everything' Two Weeks From Trial
3 minute readSmartmatic, Newsmax at War Over Witnesses in Lawsuit Over Election Defamation
2 minute readElon Musk Faces Suit Over Severance Pay From Former Twitter Legal Chief, General Counsel and Other Executives
Delaware Ruling Doesn't Forestall Fox News' Anti-SLAPP Claims Against Smartmatic, Judge Says
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250