Roundup Verdicts: Arkansas Jurors Side With Monsanto, Mistrial in Delaware
Jurors in Conway County Circuit Court, in Arkansas, gave Monsanto its 11th win on Friday in Roundup trials, and New Castle County Superior Court Judge Vivian Medinilla declared a mistrial after jurors in Delaware were deadlocked.
March 01, 2024 at 06:52 PM
3 minute read
Toxic TortsWhat You Need to Know
- The Arkansas trial involved plaintiff Robert Cody, filing on behalf of his wife, Wanda Cody, who died from non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
- The Delaware trial involved plaintiff Anthony Cloud, a South Carolina man who claimed Roundup caused his non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
- Monsanto faces three other pending Roundup trials in Pennsylvania, California and Arkansas.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJohnson & Johnson Launches $6.48B Bankruptcy Plan to Resolve Talc Lawsuits
Another Roundup Trial Kicks Off in Missouri. Monsanto Faces 3 Plaintiffs
Florida Jury Sides With Johnson & Johnson in First Post-Bankruptcy Talc Verdict
Why the Wide Range of Roundup Verdicts? It Might Depend on What Juries Hear About the EPA
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Biden Will Be First Lawyer-President Without a JD From the 'T-14' in a Century
- 2Big Law Lawyers Kick Off Legal Community Group to Support Kamala Harris
- 3AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 4The Next Generation of Potential Judges Is Losing Interest in State Supreme Courts. Here's Why
- 5'Make it Hurt': How TorHoerman Scored Groundbreaking $495M Formula Verdict
Who Got The Work
Google and YouTube have retained attorneys Asim Bhansali, Kate Lazarus and Lizzie Dinh of Kwun Bhansali Lazarus to fight a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, which asserts a single patent related to streaming video to mobile devices, was filed May 28 in California Northern District Court by Calfee, Halter & Griswold; Spencer Fane; and Villegas & Cefo on behalf of Withrow Networks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge P. Casey Pitts, is 5:24-cv-03203, Withrow Networks, Inc. v. Google, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Philip M. Bowman of Cooley has entered an appearance for Etsy, the ecommerce site, in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The action, filed July 5 in New York Eastern District Court by Rabicoff Law on behalf of Pointwise Ventures, asserts a single patent related to a pointing and identification device. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Natasha C. Merle, is 1:24-cv-04706, Pointwise Ventures LLC v. Etsy, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Munger, Tolles & Olson partners Zachary M. Briers and Heather E. Takahashi have stepped in to defend Google in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The complaint, filed July 19 in California Northern District Court by Blue Peak Law Group and Farnan LLP on behalf of Dialect LLC, asserts eight patents related to voice recognition technology. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lisa J. Cisneros, is 3:24-cv-04388, Dialect, LLC v. Google LLC.
Who Got The Work
Britt K. Latham and Margaret Dodson of Bass, Berry & Sims have entered appearances for Shoals Technologies Group and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The suit, filed May 16 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Bramlett Law Offices and Shuman, Glenn & Stecker on behalf of Robert Corwin, targets certain officers and directors for allegedly failing to disclose of a wire insulation shrinkback issue that dropped the price of the company's stock. The complaint claims that Shoals had installed defective wire harnesses in at least 300 solar fields and that the company claimed the shrinkback issue would cost between $60 to $185 million to remedy. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00615, Corwin v. Forth et al.
Who Got The Work
Mark D. Selwyn and Liv Herriot of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Apple in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 1 in California Northern District Court by the MZF Law Firm and Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing on behalf of Never-Search, asserts five patents regarding web-based mapping products and services that are being marketed under the brand Apple Maps. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin, is 3:24-cv-03945, Never-Search, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
- Driven by Rate Increases and Strong Demand, Big Law Exceeds Expectations in Q1, ALM's Q1 2024 Economic Flash Survey Finds
- ALM Market Analysis Report Series: Seattle's Booming Tech Scene Proving an Allure for Big Law
- Law.com Compass: Ranking the Healthiest Markets for Women Partners in the Am Law 200
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250