FTX Estate Seeks to Recoup $1.76B From Binance, Plus Exec 'Piggy Bank' Payouts
FTX and its affiliates, represented in the bankruptcy court by Sullivan & Cromwell and Landis, Rath & Cobb, have filed a total of 36 adversary actions since Oct. 28, 25 of which were filed on Nov. 8.
November 11, 2024 at 04:07 PM
3 minute read
BankruptcyAttorneys for FTX have filed dozens of actions in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court seeking to recover funds for the cryptocurrency exchange's bankruptcy estate, including $1.76 billion Binance received for selling its FTX stake.
Filings call the Binance clawback and others fraudulent transfers, stating FTX would have been insolvent when making payments leading up to its November 2022 Chapter 11 petition.
FTX and its affiliates, represented in the bankruptcy court by Sullivan & Cromwell and Landis, Rath & Cobb, have filed a total of 36 adversary actions since Oct. 28, 25 of which were filed on Nov. 8. Debtors' counsel has been filing adversary actions seeking to recover funds for the FTX estate for nearly two years, but previous actions have been filed more sporadically.
The Binance sale has the largest price tag among the recently-filed actions, but FTX is also attempting to recover hundreds of millions of dollars invested in cryptocurrency and distributed across multiple exchanges, as well as funds it claims were taken from FTX by criminal means.
The complaints seek to recover nearly $44 million allegedly routed through FTX to nonprofits and political action groups at a time the exchange was insolvent but before a bankruptcy petition was filed. One brings breach of fiduciary duty claims against former FTX executive Ryan Salame, who pleaded guilty to campaign finance fraud charges and is currently serving a 90-month sentence in federal prison. FTX has asked the court to void transfers made to Salame, who is alleged to have received $98.8 million in misappropriated funds from the FTX estate.
Criminal charges involving political contributions were also brought against FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried, but were dropped last July as part of an extradition treaty between the United States and the Bahamas. Filings from Nov. 8 state Bankman-Fried, former FTX executives Gary Wang and Nishad Singh and former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, using FTX as "their personal piggy bank and treasury," siphoned billions of dollars of customer funds away from FTX "to finance their lavish lifestyles, woo business prospects and political allies, line their pockets and those of their families and friends, and make reckless investments designed to prop up and advance their stature and notoriety in the crypto community."
Several of the complaints state the amount FTX executives invested in certain ventures far outweighed the returns on those investments. Among those payouts is $25 million, plus millions more in later payments and bonuses, transferred to a group that included Bankman-Fried's childhood friends and his parents' godson for the development of a video game that never progressed beyond beta testing.
"As with so many of the FTX insiders’ pre-petition 'friends and family' investments and payments, there was never even a pretense that the debtor was receiving reasonably equivalent value for its $25 million," that complaint stated.
FTX is similarly seeking to recover a $11.5 million investment in a bank holding company, which one filing called "an amount equal to double the bank’s entire reported net worth for just a 10% interest."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
US Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readThe 'Next Battleground' in Chapter 11: Third Circuit Set to Weigh Opt-Out Releases
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250