Debt holders for a cable television provider did not tortiously interfere with the company’s plan to sell assets to an industry rival because their actions were spurred by a desire to protect their investment, the state Supreme Court has ruled.
Justice Henry duPont Ridgely issued the decision on behalf of an en banc court in WaveDivision Holdings v. Highland Capital . In the case, the justices affirmed a Delaware Superior Court decision,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
