A medical device manufacturer’s former employees, who were hired by a rival allegedly in violation of their employment agreements, are not indispensable parties to the breach-of-contract litigation between the companies, the Delaware Court of Chancery has ruled.
The court held that the employees were not indispensable parties because, in fashioning a remedy, it could protect their interests even in their absence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
