The men’s professional tennis association, ATP Tour Inc., faces another hurdle in its quest to recoup the $17.5 million in attorney fees it spent to prevail in a federal antitrust lawsuit filed against the association by its member federations. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has remanded ATP’s request back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware to determine the validity of an association bylaw that requires tour members to reimburse the association in any litigation in which the members do not prevail.

A three-judge panel composed of Judges Marjorie O. Rendell, Thomas L. Ambro and Richard L. Nygaard issued the decision inDeutscher Tennis Bund v. ATP Tour. The appellate court’s decision remands the case back to U.S. District Judge Gregory M. Sleet, who initially denied ATP’s request for attorney fees.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]