Should the review standard for a going-private merger led by a controlling stockholder be the arduous entire fairness standard or the less stringent business judgment rule?
The Delaware Supreme Court wrestled with that question last week when attorneys representing investors who filed a Delaware Court of Chancery lawsuit over MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings’ full acquisition of an affiliate said that trial court had erred when it reviewed the transaction under the business judgment rule.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
