Plaintiffs who retain their own counsel in class action lawsuits may still owe attorney fees to other counsel who created additional benefits for shareholders, the Delaware Court of Chancery has ruled. The court issued the opinion when it awarded $3.9 million in attorney fees to a trio of law firms that reached a settlement between Revlon Inc. and its stockholders in a 2009 lawsuit, despite objections from Fidelity Management & Research Co.
“Delaware courts have long taken into account the degree of causation between counsel’s efforts and the result when awarding reasonable attorney fees,” said Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster in Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins v. Fidelity Management & Research. “Delaware courts have not adopted a bright-line rule that precludes plaintiffs’ counsel from obtaining a fee just because another actor retains counsel and contributes to the creation of a benefit.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
