New York courts should follow Delaware’s no-discovery rule once a shareholder plaintiff has made a presuit demand upon a corporate board that is refused, a unanimous panel on the Appellate Division, First Department held last week.
The so-called “demand refusal” context arises when a shareholder plaintiff in a derivative proceeding urges a board to bring suit against a corporation but the board refuses after review.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
