A conflict of interest must be alleged before a transaction can be reviewed under the more stringent entire-fairness standard, the Delaware Court of Chancery has ruled. The court’s opinion dismissed a lawsuit filed by shareholders of Crimson Exploration Inc. who objected to the company’s $390 million all-stock merger with Contango Oil & Gas Co.

Crimson, a Houston oil and gas company, completed its merger with Contango, a rival oil company also based in Houston, earlier this year. Shortly after the transaction was announced last year, Crimson’s shareholders filed a Delaware Chancery Court lawsuit alleging the company’s controlling stockholder, Oaktree Capital Management LP, forced the sale at an inadequate price and received benefits unavailable to common stockholders. At the time of the transaction, Oaktree owned roughly 33.7 percent of Crimson’s stock and an unspecified portion of the company’s debt, according to court documents.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]