In just the past three months, the Delaware Court of Chancery has issued four opinions (In re KKR Financial Holdings LLC Shareholder Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 9210-CB; In re Crimson Exploration Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 8541-VCP; In re Sanchez Energy Derivative Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 9132-VG; and In re Zhongpin Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 7393-VCN) addressing the circumstances in which a minority stockholder may be deemed a controlling stockholder under Delaware law.
It is well settled that a stockholder is deemed to be a “controlling” stockholder only where: (1) it owns more than 50 percent of the voting power of a corporation, or (2) it exercises actual control over the corporation’s board of directors. The above referenced opinions, which are discussed below, provide valuable guidance as to the circumstances under which minority stockholders may be deemed a controller under the second part of this test. Specifically, the cases make clear that actual board control in the transaction at issue is the “defining and necessary feature of a minority controlling stockholder.”
In re KKR
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]