Delaware Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves has tossed a shareholder’s derivative case against the board of security company ADT Corp., saying the complaint largely mirrored an ill-fated prior suit that challenged the same actions.

Both cases stemmed from a series of concessions board members made to activist investor Keith A. Meister shortly after ADT spun off from Tyco International and began trading publicly in October 2012. Meister, through his investment firm Corvex Management, bought about 5 percent of ADT’s outstanding stock and lobbied the board to issue debt securities to bankroll stock repurchases.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]