Plaintiffs’ attorneys are setting up for a battle in Delaware federal court over lead counsel status in derivative litigation challenging Tesla Inc.’s $2.6 billion bid to acquire an allegedly failing solar energy system installer SolarCity Corp.
On May 4, attorneys from Grant & Eisenhofer, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd moved to consolidate and appoint co-lead counsel in two cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, each accusing Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Tesla’s officers of overpaying for the firm in a conflicted deal that would allegedly benefit Musk and his family members.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
