Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
2,443 results for '* court:"COURT OF DELAWARE"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-01-18
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew P. Denn, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher Oprison, DLA Piper LLP, Miami, FL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Seth Niederman, Katelyn M. Crawford, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert S. Tintner, Nathan M. Buchter, Fox Rothschild LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D69683
Claim under Section 766A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts failed where claimant failed to allege that it was unable to secure performance from its contractual counterparty due to the interference of the defendant.
Publication Date: 2022-01-11
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Aerospace | E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Touhe, Myer, Kratz & Berry, LLP, Wilmington, DE; R. David Donoghue, Anthony J. Fuga, Lisa M. Kpor, Holland & Knight, LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jeffrey L. Moyer, Valerie A. Caras, Richards, Layton, Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; John H. Hemann, Kathleen Hartnett, Lauren Pomeroy Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D69674
The court held that the public and private interest factors involved in this forum non conveniens analysis did not tip in de-fendants' favor to overcome the slight deference to plaintiff's choice of forum where sources of proof were in Connecticut and there was no evidence of unwilling witnesses outside of the district that would present a compulsory process issue.
Publication Date: 2022-01-04
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David M. Klauder, Ryan M. Ernst, Bielli & Klauder, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Thomas D. Bielli, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Brett D. Fallon, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeremy M. Sternberg, Holland & Knight LLP, Boston, MA; Stosh Silivos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D69662
The court held that defendant was entitled to a grant of summary judgment being that the action was barred by res judicata.
Publication Date: 2021-12-28
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carolyn I. Hahn, Colin T. Reardon, Gabriel S.H. Hopkins, Jane M.E. Peterson, Stephen C. Jacques, Tiffany Hardy, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff;
for defendant: Daniel M. Silver, McCarther & English LLP, Wilmington, DE; Megan Ix Brison, Michael A. Weidinger, Pinckney Weidinger Urban & Joyce LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69660
Agency enforcement action filed by agency head who was subject to an unconstitutional removal provision was not automatically void, thereby eliminating the need for the agency to later timely ratify the action within the statute of limitations.
Publication Date: 2021-12-21
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David G. Culley, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff;
for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69652
Product liability claim based on "indeterminate product test" dismissed where the test provided an evidentiary means of proving manufacturing defects but did not itself constitute a separate legal claim.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: NOBLE F. ALLEN
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-12-14
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David G. Culley, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff
for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. David Bickham, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael K. Brown, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants
Case Number: D69645
Motion to dismiss amended product liability claim involving medical device denied where the amended complaint asserted new facts further explaining the similarities between the product-in-suit and other products subject to consumer complaints and recalls.
Publication Date: 2021-12-07
Practice Area: Toxic Torts
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Evans, Kyle John Mcgee, Kelly L. Tucker, Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Frank M. Petosa, Marcio W. Valladares, Michael Ram, Rene F. Rocha, T. Michael Morgan, Morgan & Morgan, Fort Lauderdale, FL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kenneth J. Nachbar, Miranda N. Gilbert, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Zi-Xiang Shen, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Athena D. Dalton, Stephen A. Swedlow, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69635
The court held that plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action for tort claims because they were unable to plead that they had received an injury from defendant's allegedly negligent leaking of a known carcinogen around where plaintiffs lived.
Publication Date: 2021-12-07
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Manufacturing | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Phillip Kim, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., New York, NY; Timothy Brown, The Brown Law Firm, P.C., Oyster Bay, NY; Marion C. Passmore, Melissa A. Fortunato, Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Lori W. Will, Nora M. Crawford, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Gregory L. Watts, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Seattle, WA for defendants.
Case Number: D69636
The court found the settlement in this derivative action to be fair and reasonable where the balance of the Girsh factors favored settlement.
Publication Date: 2021-12-07
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael D. Lynch, Candence B. Lynch, pro se appellants
for defendant: Miami, FL. Victoria A. Guilfoyle, Brian J. Hall, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark S. Indelicato, Jeffrey Zawadski, Hahn Hessen LLP, New York, NY for appellee.
Case Number: D69637
Because appellants attempted to re-litigate arguments that were already considered and rejected by the court, their motion to basically re-open their bankruptcy matter failed to satisfy the requirements of either Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) or 60(b).
Publication Date: 2021-11-30
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Blake A. Bennett, Cooch & Taylor, P.A. Wilmington, DE, Francis A. Bottini, Jr., Albert Y. Chang, Anne Beste, Yury A. Kolesnikov, Bottini & Bottini, Inc., La Jolla, CA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Jonathan A. Choa, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Koji Fukumura, Peter M. Adams, Heather Speers, Cooley, LLP, San Diego, CA; Brian French, Cooley, LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69626
The court held that plaintiffs' claims for breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duties, and unjust enrichment should be dismissed for failing to plead demand futility.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read