Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
2,443 results for '* court:"COURT OF DELAWARE"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-11-30
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Travel and Tourism
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Anna Tractenberg, Craig Tractenberg, Villanova, Pennsylvania, pro se plaintiffs.
for defendant: Brannan Cole, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, DE; Marc Sposato, Riley B. MacGray, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69627
Court declined to exercise personal jurisdiction over foreign subsidiary of domestic parent where subsidiary had no contacts with the forum and the parent's domestic actions could not be imputed to a subsidiary.
Publication Date: 2021-11-23
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Johnny L. Dorazio, Sr., pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D69618
The court held that plaintiff could not maintain a constitutional claim based upon allegations that his grievances about treatment in prison were not adequately addressed, making his complaint against prison employees a frivolous suit.
Publication Date: 2021-11-23
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Corby Vowell, Dave R. Gunter, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David H. Bluestone, Michael D. Educate, Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg, LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69620
Court adopted plain and ordinary meaning for disputed terms in claim construction where patent specifications did not include negative limiting language or display the patentee's intention to redefine terms with plain and ordinary meanings.
Publication Date: 2021-11-23
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric Harris, Howard R. Young Correctional Institution, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D69619
Although inmate sufficiently pled a serious medical need and defendants' failure to provide care for that need, the court dismissed the complaint on screening when it was unclear as to whether the alleged wrongful conduct occurred within the statute of limitations.
Publication Date: 2021-11-23
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth A. Stafford, Newport, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D69621
Court dismissed §1983 claims against state agency pursuant to Eleventh Amendment immunity and against a municipal police department where agencies of municipalities were not cognizable parties in §1983 actions.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Hal R. Lieberman, J. Richard Supple, Jr., Harvey Prager
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-11-16
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen E. Keller, Jeff Castellano, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bijal Vakil, Jeremy T. Elman, White & Case LLP, Palo Alto, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Alexandra M. Cumings, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John S. Letchinger, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Chicago, IL, Jared A. Brandyberry, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Denver, CO for defendants.
Case Number: D69610
The court held that 1) plaintiff established personal jurisdiction over defendant Singapore Telecommunications Limited, or Singtel, as to the breach of contract claim by virtue of Singtel' s consent to the forum selection clause, 2) plaintiff failed to establish personal jurisdiction over Singtel as to the patent infringement claim and 3) Singtel established good cause to stay plaintiff's breach of contract claim against it.
Publication Date: 2021-11-16
Practice Area: Trade Secrets
Industry: Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jody Barillare, John P. Bramble, Michael P. Jones, Nancy L. Patterson, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Leslie B. Spoltore, Dove Burns, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69611
Misappropriation and tortious interference claims survived dismissal where company plausibly alleged that competitor solicited trade secrets from its chief executive officer and worked with the CEO to poach other key employees, in violation of the CEO's employment agreements.
Publication Date: 2021-11-16
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Maureen McCartney, Jesse S. Wenger, Christopher L. de Barrena-Sarobe, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Delaware, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Edson A. Bostic, The Bostic Law Firm, Philadelphia, PA; Conor Wilson, Office of The Federal Public Defender, Wilmington, DE; Jose Luis Ongay, Law Offices of Jose Luis Ongay, Plymouth Meeting, PA; Michael N. Huff, Law Offices of Michael N. Huff, Philadelphia, PA; Luis A. Ortiz, Law Offices of Luis A. Ortiz, Philadelphia, PA; Christopher G. Furlong, Law Offices of Christopher G. Furlong, Media, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D69613
Cyberstalking constituted a predicate crime of violence to support a firearms charge, where the elements of the charged cyberstalking offense necessarily alleged that defendant engaged in conduct that involved threatening the use of physical force or violence.
Publication Date: 2021-11-09
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard A. Barkasy, Kristi J. Doughty, Stephen A. Fogdall, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel M. Pereira, Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs
for defendant: Catherine A. Gaul, Michael Dean Walker, Jr. Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Peter L. Loh, Davis G. Mosmeyer III, Sara A. Brown, Foley & Lardner LLP, Dallas, TX for defendant.
Case Number: D69605
Motion for leave to amend granted where the new proposed claims were based in part on facts that were not known to plaintiff until revealed during discovery.
Publication Date: 2021-11-09
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christofer Curtis Johnson, The Johnson Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Mary A. Jacobson, New Castle County Law Department, New Castle, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69599
The court held that where plaintiff alleged that when police received a tip about drug dealing at his house, police did not investigate further but forcibly subdued and arrested him, plaintiff stated a claim for excessive force and unlawful arrest.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read