Filter This View

  • Pharmacy Corp. of Am./Askari Consol. Litig.

    Publication Date: 2021-09-22
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Cianciulli, Weir & Partners, Wilmington, DE; Walter Weir, Jr., Steven E. Angstreich, Amy R. Brandt, Andrew Park, Weir & Partners, Philadelphia, PA; James Sawyer, Law Office of James Sawyer for Kaveh Askari and Onco360 Holdings parties.
    for defendant: Brett D. Fallon, Faergre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher G. Kelly, Stosh M. Silivos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy M. Sternberg, Holland & Knight, LLC, Boston, MA for Pharmacy Corp. of Am.
    Case Number: D69546

    Plaintiffs did not identify any manifest error in the court's rulings or with respect to the final judgment, so they were not en-titled to amendment of the final judgment or a new trial.

  • Columbus Life Ins. Co. v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.

    Publication Date: 2021-09-22
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Insurance
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald L. Gouge, Jr., Donald L. Gouge, Jr., LLC, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Miller, Joseph M. Kelleher, Philip J. Farinella, Cozen O’Connor, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kevin G. Abrams, John M. Seaman, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Harry S. Davis, Robert E. Griffin, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York, NY; Aislinn K. Affinito, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
    Case Number: D69542

    Promissory estoppel and negligent misrepresentation counterclaims failed where holder of stranger-owned life insurance policy could not succeed on a legal claim to require insurer to pay out on the illegal and void policy.

  • In re: Zohar III, Corp.

    Publication Date: 2021-09-08
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Norman L. Pernick, G. David Dean, Patrick J. Reilley, Cole Schotz, PC, Wilmington, DE; Monica K. Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Denver, CO; Randy M. Mastro, Akiva Shapiro, Michael L. Nadler, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Michael G. Farag, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA for appellant.
    for defendant: James L. Patton, Jr., Robert S. Brady, Michael R. Nestor, Joseph M. Barry, Ryan M. Bartley, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for debtors.
    Case Number: D69533

    Bankruptcy court properly interpreted a disputed term based on the plain language of the contract itself, so extrinsic evidence was not necessary.

  • Ninivaggi v. Univ. of Delaware

    Publication Date: 2021-09-08
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Bibas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Scott M. Tucker, Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joshua D. Arisohn, Bursor & Fisher, P.A., New York, NY; Christopher P. Simon, Michael L. Vild, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Eric M. Poulin, Roy T. Willey, IV, Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, Charleston, SC for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: James D. Taylor, Jr., Charles E. Davis, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: D69532

    Students and parents stated viable claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment after a university switched to online classes due to the pandemic and refused to refund certain fees and tuition charges.

  • Avenatti v. Fox News Networks, LLC

    Publication Date: 2021-09-01
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Bibas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Karl Hill, Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David E. Ross, Eric D. Selden, R. Garrett Rice, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric M. George, Richard A. Schwartz, Katherine F. Murray, Browne George Ross O’brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
    Case Number: D69518

    Defamation suit failed where press coverage was substantially true or included clear statements of protected opinion.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Winning at Trial: Insights from the Bench and Leading Litigators

    Authors: David R. Marriott

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • SOC-SMG, Inc. v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-08-11
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Construction | Defense | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Bibas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary W. Lipkin, Alexandra D. Rogin, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Martin S. Lessner, M. Paige Valeski, Alberto E. Chavez, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Attison L. Barnes, III, Krystal B. Swendsboe, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
    Case Number: D69501

    The court denied a motion to dismiss because plaintiff adequately alleged claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where defendant purportedly structured a settlement with a third party to avoid paying plaintiff.

  • DuBose v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-08-11
    Practice Area: Class Actions
    Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herbert W. Mondros, Rigrodsky Law, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Howard B. Prossnitz, Law Offices of Howard Prossnitz, Oak Park, IL; Adam Szulczewski, Chicago IL for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Matthew Denn, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: D69498

    Plaintiffs made a judicial admission regarding the tolling of their tort claims, and they failed to establish any other basis for tolling the statute of limitations.

  • Archer v. Defenders, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Bibas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herbert W. Mondros, Rigrodsky Law P.A., Wilmington, DE; Eyal Dror, Trief & Olk, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: J. Cory Falgowski, Burr & Forman LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ronald W. Flowers, H. Carlton Hilson, Burr & Forman LLP, Birmingham, AL for defendant.
    Case Number: D69486

    Court excluded evidence untimely produced in discovery by defendant, where defendant was grossly negligent in searching for the evidence and plaintiffs would be prejudiced by the delay in needing to review the evidence.

  • Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. Transit U, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
    Industry: Insurance | Transportation
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bove, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ronald P. Schiller, Matthew N. Klebanoff, Daniel P. Kaufman, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David J. Soldo, Damon B. Ferarra, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel P. Bennett, Mintzer, Saro-witz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
    Case Number: D69491

    Plaintiff was entitled to proceed with certain declaratory relief claims, but the court granted a motion to dismiss a claim that sought reformation of an insurance policy to which plaintiff was not a party.

  • Springsteen v. Proctor & Gamble Co.

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Products Liability
    Industry: Consumer Products
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jerry Springsteen, Rochester, MN, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: N/A
    Case Number: D69493

    After screening a pleading filed by a pro se plaintiff, the court dismissed the complaint, but gave plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.