Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
2,437 results for '* court:"COURT OF DELAWARE"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-06-03
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Hall
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69005
The court granted the parties' motion to consolidate these two shareholder derivative actions.
Publication Date: 2020-05-27
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory F. Fischer, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Michael B. de Leeuw, Matthew L. Elkin, and Martin Bloor, Cozen O’Connor, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Andrew L. Cole and Bradley P. Lehman, Cole Schotz, Wilmington, DE; Steven R. Klein and Rachel A. Mongiello, Cole Schotz, Hackensack, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D68990
Tortious interference counterclaim brought by LLC member terminated as CEO dismissed on summary judgment where the LLC duty of loyalty did not extend to members acting with respect to one another in the employment context.
Publication Date: 2020-05-27
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jesse S. Wenger, Assistant United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE for the government.
for defendant: Mark S. Greenberg, Blue Bell, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68996
The court denied defendant's motion to suppress, because police had found a handgun in defendant's ve-hicle pursuant to a valid traffic stop.
Publication Date: 2020-05-20
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sarah T. Andrade, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edward S. Sledge IV, Whitt Steineker, Zachary A. Madonia, Hillary C. Campbell and K. Laney Gifford, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. Allen Maines, Caroline Johnson Tanner, A. André Hendrick, Matthew D. Friedlander, Patrick B. Reagin and Jacquelyn Thomas Watts, Holland & Knight LLP, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
Case Number: D68987
Defendants were bound by a forum selection clause in an asset purchase agreement, so the court granted plaintiffs' motion to remand the case to state court.
Publication Date: 2020-05-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Goddess, Cooch & Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Brian C. Dunning, Dunning Rievman & Davies LLP, New York, NY; James Sawyer, Dunning Rievman & Davies LLP, Jericho, NY for Kaveh Askari and Onco 360 parties. Brett D. Fallon, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE ; Christopher G. Kelly, Stosh Silivos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy M. Sternberg, Holland & Knight LLP, Boston, MA for Pharmacy Corp. parties.
for defendant:
Case Number: D68972
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, because they did not demonstrate that an increase in a working capital loan constituted a "major decision" under the terms of their agreements.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Robert F. Connolly, MST, Susan K. Dromsky-Reed, Jeffrey D. Gordon, Tiffany Wagner Donio, Frances B. Stella, Alysse Mcloughlin, Kathleen Quinn
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-05-06
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary R. Spritz, Gary R. Spritz, Esq., Wilmington, DE for father.
for defendant: Susan E. Morrison, Brandon J. Pakkebier and Daniel A. Taylor, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE for mother.
Case Number: D68970
Father established that he was exercising his custodial rights with respect to his minor daughter at the time mother removed the child to the United States. The court ordered mother to return the child to Mexico under the Child Abduction Remedies Act.
Publication Date: 2020-04-29
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ryan M. Ernst, O’Kelly Ernst & Joyce, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Alexandra B. Raymond, Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., New York, NY; Richard A. Acocelli, Michael A. Rogovin and Kelly K. Moran, Weiss Law LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: David E. Ross, Ross, Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter L. Welsh and Christian Reigstad, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D68962
A proxy statement contained a disclaimer about certain financial projections, so the court dismissed plaintiffs' claims for viola-tions of securities law.
Publication Date: 2020-04-29
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan and Joseph J. Farnan, Jr., Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andres C. Healy, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA; Lexie G. White, Hunter A. Vance, Alejandra C. Salinas, Jeffrey S. David and Rocco Magni, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam Alper, Reza Do-khanchy, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael W. De Vries, Christopher M. Lawless and JB Schiller, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D68963
Defendants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its counterclaims, so the court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Publication Date: 2020-04-22
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Federal Government | Technology Media and Telecom | Travel and Tourism
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Laura D. Hatcher, Shamoor Anis, United States Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Julie S. Elmer, Scott A. Westrich, Sarah P. McDonough, Robert A. Lepore, Aaron Comenetz, Brian E. Hanna, Craig W. Conrath, Dylan M. Carson, Rachel A. Flipse, Michael T. Nash, Jeremy P. Evans, Vittorio Cottafavi, Seth J. Wiener, John A. Holler, Grant A. Bermann and Katherine A. Celeste, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Joseph O. Larkin, Veronica A. Bartholomew, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; Tara L. Reinhart, Steven C. Sunshine, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC; Matthew M. Martino, Michael H. Meni-tove and Evan R. Kreiner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY for Sabre defendants. Daniel A. Mason, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kenneth A. Gallo, Jonathan S. Kanter, Joseph J. Bial and Daniel J. Howley, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC for defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, LP.
Case Number: D68956
The government failed to demonstrate a relevant market in this case involving companies that provided airline booking ser-vices, so the court allowed the merger to proceed.
Publication Date: 2020-04-15
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Angela Pinto Ross, Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: David C. Weiss, United States Attorney; Heather Benderson, Eric P. Kressman and Melissa K. Curry, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68948
A decision by an administrative law judge was not supported by substantial evidence, so the court remanded for further con-sideration of issues relating to plaintiff's residual functional capacity and whether she was able to work on a regular and contin-uing basis.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read