Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
2,437 results for '* court:"COURT OF DELAWARE"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-04-08
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David W. Marston, Jr. and Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Lyons and Ehsun Forghany, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Sharon R. Smith and Brett A. Lovejoy, Ph.D., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Stamatios Stamoulis, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stephen M. Lobbin and Austin J. Richardson, SML Avvocati P.C., San Diego, CA for defendants.
Case Number: D68935
Judgment as a matter of law or new trial on infringement claims denied where plaintiff presented expert testimony and real-world evidence showing that consumers were confused by defendant's allegedly infringing products.
Publication Date: 2020-04-08
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy Devlin and James Lennon, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Elizabeth Sloan, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE; David Grossman, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
Case Number: D68937
Plaintiff failed to state a claim for direct copyright infringement because no substantial similarity existed between plaintiff's work and that of defendant. Plaintiff's work was not entitled to moral rights protection, because it was not a work of visual art.
Publication Date: 2020-04-08
Practice Area: Wrongful Death
Industry: Aerospace | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph J. Farnan, Jr., Joseph J. Farnan, III, Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Cynthia M. Devers, The Wolk Law Firm, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Paul M. Lukoff and Andrea Brooks, Wilks, Lukoff & Bracegirdle, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Sherri R. Ginger, Mark B. Roberts and Timothy A. Heisterhagen, Armbrecht Jackson LLP, Mobile, AL for defendant.
Case Number: D68938
The statute of repose under the General Aviation Revitalization Act preluded plaintiffs' claim against the manufacturer of an aircraft part.
Publication Date: 2020-04-01
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer K. Welch and Carly A. Hudson, Assistant U. S. Attorneys for the government.
for defendant: Anthony J. Petron, Law Offices of Anthony J. Petron, Philadelphia, PA; Gary S. Silver, Silver Legal Services, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68933
The court denied a motion to suppress physical evidence because law enforcement officials acted reasonably under the circum-stances. Defendant voluntarily made a pre-arrest statement to police, and he waived his rights prior to giving a recorded state-ment.
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Travel and Tourism
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Neal C. Belgam and Eve H. Ormerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan v. Stein and Cole Carson, GrayRobinson, P.A. Tampa, FL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward A. Pennington, John P. Moy, John P. Pennington, and Darlene K. Tzou, Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D68918
Motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to the "exceptional case" standard for patent infringement cases denied where plaintiff's patent, although directed to a non-inventive concept, was not indicative of an exceptionally meritless claim, and where plaintiff's litigation conduct was not conclusively indicative of vexatious litigation conduct.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: George J. Kenny, Frank A. Lattal
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver and Alexandra M. Joyce McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE
for defendant: Daralyn J. Durie, Adam R. Brausa, Eric C. Wiener and Enenda Hoxha, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA for Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. Paul B. Gaffney, David I. Berl, Thomas S. Fletcher, Kyle E. Thomason, Teagan J. Gregory, Charles L. McCloud and Kathryn S. Kayali, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; William F. Lee, Lisa J. Pirozzolo, Emily R. Whelan, Kevin S. Prussia, Andrew J. Danford, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA; Robert J. Gunther Jr., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY; and Nora Passmaneck of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Denver, CO for Genentech, Inc. Melanie K. Sharp and James L. Higgins, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neal C. Belgam, Eve H. Ormerod and Jennifer M. Rutter, Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for Amgen Inc.
Case Number: D68923
The court relied on extrinsic evidence to construe a term relating to a fermentation process in this pharmaceutical patent case.
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph A. Mahoney, Mayer Brown LLP, Charlotte, NC; B. Clayton McCraw and Ying-Zi Yang, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Melanie K. Sharp, James L. Higgins and Michelle M. Ovanesian, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven Lieberman, Rachel M. Echols, Daniel R. McCallum and Nicole M. DeAbrantes, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D68922
The court dismissed plaintiff's claim for direct patent infringement, but it denied the motion to dismiss as to the claim for indi-rect infringement.
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68924
The court denied habeas corpus relief because petitioner voluntarily entered a guilty plea and he failed to demonstrate ineffec-tive assistance of counsel.
Publication Date: 2020-03-18
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel R. Cousins, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Stuart B. Drowos, Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, attorney for defendants.
Case Number: D68911
Motion to compel production of documents granted to the extent that correctional facility could conduct additional search for the duty roster for the section and timeframe in question in plaintiff's inmate's complaint.
Publication Date: 2020-03-18
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew G. Summers, Brittany M. Giusini and William J. Burton, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Stephen M. Ferguson, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for the state.
Case Number: D68915
Inmate failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction preventing his transfer to another correctional facility.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read